Is wshobson/agents/secrets-management safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
49/100

context safety score

A score of 49/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
69
content
0
graph
59

6 threat patterns detected

high

credential exposure

Found 16 secret pattern match(es) in repository files

low

supply chain

Found 2 install-script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

low

supply chain

Found 2 remote script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

high

typosquat

Skill named 'secrets-management' in generic repo 'wshobson/agents' from unverified personal account. The high-trust name implies credential/secret handling capability but SKILL.md is completely empty (0 lines) and the skill is not listed on any registry. The name appears designed to attract agents seeking secrets management functionality, potentially intercepting sensitive data by name-squatting a common capability category. (location: metadata.json:skill_name)

high

scope violation

The skill_description field contains 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1' — an HTML viewport meta tag value, not a legitimate skill description. This indicates the metadata was fabricated or scraped from an HTML page and injected into the skill definition. Combined with an empty SKILL.md, the skill has no legitimate declared functionality despite claiming 7.69M installs. (location: metadata.json:skill_description)

medium

description injection

SKILL.md is completely empty (0 bytes) for a skill named 'secrets-management' supposedly with 29K stars and 7.69M installs. A legitimate, widely-used secrets management skill would have tool definitions, parameter schemas, and usage documentation. The absence of any content while bearing a high-privilege name suggests this is either a placeholder for future injection or relies on name-based trust to get agents to route sensitive operations to it. (location: SKILL.md)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/skill/wshobson%2Fagents%2Fsecrets-management

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this skill in agent workflows.

Is wshobson/agents/secrets-management safe for AI agents to use?

wshobson/agents/secrets-management currently scores 49/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this skill.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this skill score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this skill?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

February 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.