Is wshobson/agents/anti-reversing-techniques safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
49/100

context safety score

A score of 49/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
69
content
0
graph
59

6 threat patterns detected

high

credential exposure

Found 16 secret pattern match(es) in repository files

low

supply chain

Found 2 install-script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

low

supply chain

Found 2 remote script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

high

scope violation

SKILL.md is completely empty (0 lines) — the skill defines no tools, parameters, or capabilities whatsoever. A skill with 0 documented functionality that claims 7.69M installs and 29K stars is fundamentally suspicious. There is nothing for an agent to legitimately execute, yet it presents itself as an installable skill. (location: SKILL.md)

high

typosquat

The repo 'wshobson/agents' uses an extremely generic name that could impersonate well-known agent frameworks (e.g., huggingface/transformers-agents, langchain agents). The skill_description field contains 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1' — an HTML viewport meta tag, not a real description — indicating the metadata was scraped from an HTML page or deliberately fabricated. The skill name 'anti-reversing-techniques' explicitly advertises evasion of security analysis. Combined with not being listed on the registry (listed_on_registry: false) and not being org-verified, the high star/install counts are not trustworthy signals. (location: metadata.json)

medium

scope violation

The skill name 'anti-reversing-techniques' explicitly describes techniques to evade reverse engineering and security analysis. This is an adversarial framing for an AI agent skill — legitimate skills describe what they do for the user, not how they resist inspection. An empty SKILL.md paired with this name suggests the skill's true behavior may be hidden or loaded at runtime from elsewhere. (location: metadata.json (skill_name field))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/skill/wshobson%2Fagents%2Fanti-reversing-techniques

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this skill in agent workflows.

Is wshobson/agents/anti-reversing-techniques safe for AI agents to use?

wshobson/agents/anti-reversing-techniques currently scores 49/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this skill.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this skill score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this skill?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

February 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.