Is supercent-io/skills-template/prompt-repetition safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
31/100

context safety score

A score of 31/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
65
behavior
44
content
0
graph
46

7 threat patterns detected

high

credential exposure

Found 14 secret pattern match(es) in repository files

low

supply chain

Found 8 install-script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

low

supply chain

Found 8 remote script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

medium

supply chain

Found 5 unexpected binary file(s) in source repository

high

description injection

The skill_description field contains 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1' — an HTML meta viewport tag fragment injected as the skill description. This is not a legitimate capability description; it is either a scraping artifact indicating the metadata was fabricated/auto-generated from HTML, or an attempt to inject unexpected content into agent context. Combined with an empty SKILL.md, this skill has no legitimate documented purpose. (location: metadata.json:skill_description)

high

scope violation

SKILL.md is completely empty (0 bytes) while the repo is named 'skills-template' — the skill declares no capabilities, no tools, no parameters, and no purpose whatsoever. A skill with zero documented functionality and zero content is inherently deceptive if distributed as a usable skill, as agents cannot make informed decisions about what it does. (location: SKILL.md)

high

supply chain

Extreme mismatch between trust signals: 13 stars, 2 forks, 3 contributors, no license, not listed on registry, org not verified — yet claims 7,690,000 installs. This install count is implausible for a repo with 13 stars and suggests fabricated or inflated metrics. The repo name 'skills-template' combined with an empty SKILL.md and an HTML-fragment description indicates this is not a legitimate production skill. (location: metadata.json)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/skill/supercent-io%2Fskills-template%2Fprompt-repetition

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this skill in agent workflows.

Is supercent-io/skills-template/prompt-repetition safe for AI agents to use?

supercent-io/skills-template/prompt-repetition currently scores 31/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this skill.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this skill score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this skill?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 1, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.