Is supercent-io/skills-template/codebase-search safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
31/100

context safety score

A score of 31/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
65
behavior
44
content
0
graph
46

7 threat patterns detected

high

credential exposure

Found 14 secret pattern match(es) in repository files

low

supply chain

Found 8 install-script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

low

supply chain

Found 8 remote script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

medium

supply chain

Found 5 unexpected binary file(s) in source repository

medium

doc injection

AGENTS.md falsely claims authorship by 'Vercel Engineering' (lines 3-4) and states it is for agents/LLMs working 'at Vercel' (lines 7-11). The repository is owned by supercent-io, an unverified organization with 13 stars, not by Vercel. This false attribution gives the agent configuration file unearned authority when consumed by AI agents, who would treat the instructions as coming from Vercel's official engineering team. The technical content itself is legitimate React best practices with no malicious instructions. (location: agent-configs/.agent-skills__react-best-practices__AGENTS.md:3-11)

high

typosquat

Skill claims name 'codebase-search' (a generic high-value name) but repo is 'skills-template'. 13 stars with 7.69M claimed installs is an extreme mismatch suggesting inflated metrics. Not listed on registry, org not verified, no license, and SKILL.md is completely empty — consistent with name-squatting a popular skill concept. (location: metadata.json)

medium

scope violation

skill_description field contains 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1' — an HTML viewport meta tag, not a skill description. This is either scraped garbage data or a malformed placeholder, meaning the skill misrepresents itself. Combined with an empty SKILL.md, the skill has no legitimate declared functionality despite claiming a functional name. (location: metadata.json: skill_description field)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/skill/supercent-io%2Fskills-template%2Fcodebase-search

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this skill in agent workflows.

Is supercent-io/skills-template/codebase-search safe for AI agents to use?

supercent-io/skills-template/codebase-search currently scores 31/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this skill.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this skill score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this skill?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 1, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.