Is giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/react-patterns safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
75
behavior
79
content
0
graph
51

7 threat patterns detected

high

credential exposure

Found 41 secret pattern match(es) in repository files

low

supply chain

Found 3 install-script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

low

supply chain

Found 1 remote script pattern(s) in documentation (likely install instructions, not executable)

medium

supply chain

Found 2 unexpected binary file(s) in source repository

high

typosquat

Skill named 'react-patterns' published from repo 'developer-kit' by a relatively new individual account (441 days, unverified). 'react-patterns' is a well-known name in the React ecosystem. The mismatch between repo name and skill name, combined with not being listed on the registry despite claiming 7.69M installs, suggests this may be impersonating established react-patterns resources. (location: metadata.json: skill_name vs repo name mismatch)

medium

scope violation

The skill_description field contains 'width=device-width, initial-scale=1' — an HTML viewport meta tag value, not a legitimate skill description. This indicates the skill metadata was either scraped from an HTML page or deliberately filled with nonsensical content. Combined with an entirely empty SKILL.md, this skill has no legitimate documented purpose, making its actual behavior opaque and unverifiable. (location: metadata.json: skill_description field)

medium

supply chain

Extreme disparity between claimed 7.69M installs and only 116 GitHub stars from 3 contributors on an unlisted skill from a 441-day-old unverified account. These metrics are inconsistent with a legitimate popular package and suggest either inflated install counts or a package that was substituted/republished under a popular name. (location: metadata.json: install_count vs stars/contributors/account_age)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/skill/giuseppe-trisciuoglio%2Fdeveloper-kit%2Freact-patterns

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this skill in agent workflows.

Is giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/react-patterns safe for AI agents to use?

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/react-patterns currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this skill.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this skill score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this skill?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

February 26, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.