Is xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
40/100

context safety score

A score of 40/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
80
behavior
55
content
20
graph
30

8 threat patterns detected

medium

domain spoof risk

domain has spoofing indicators (punycode/confusable/highly synthetic naming)

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

credential harvesting

credential form posts to an off-domain endpoint (may be legitimate SSO/OAuth)

high

malicious redirect

The page is served from domain xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net (punycode for a Thai adult site) but all canonical URLs, links, login forms, and content resources point to a different domain xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com. The canonical tag explicitly redirects SEO authority and user navigation to xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com. The logo image and navigation links split between both domains, indicating the .net domain is a shadow/redirect site funneling traffic to the .com domain. (location: page.html:165 - <link rel="canonical" href="https://xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com/"> and page.html:336 - logo href pointing to xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com)

high

credential harvesting

A login modal form posts credentials (username and password) to https://xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com/ — a different domain than the one being visited (xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net). Users who believe they are logging into the .net site are actually submitting credentials cross-domain to the .com site, which may or may not be controlled by the same actor. A password reset form similarly posts to the foreign domain. (location: page.html:1047 - <form id="wpst_login_form" action="https://xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com/" method="post"> and page.html:1071)

medium

social engineering

Embedded banner ads link to third-party gambling/lottery and app-download sites (m.appcatcat.com and xn---88-3ml6bqp5a9iqh.net/user/register) using deceptive alt-text ('สล็อตเว็บตรง' = straight slot site, 'แทงหวย' = lottery betting). These ads are embedded within an adult content site to exploit low-guard users and drive registration on gambling/lottery platforms. (location: page.html:374-379 - <a href="https://m.appcatcat.com/th/login"> and <a href="https://xn---88-3ml6bqp5a9iqh.net/user/register">)

medium

hidden content

The site title CSS sets font-size to 0px for .site-title a, making the site title text invisible to users while remaining visible to crawlers and AI agents. This is a SEO cloaking technique that hides the actual brand name from visual display while embedding it in machine-readable contexts. (location: page.html:29 - .site-title a { font-size: 0px; })

medium

brand impersonation

The page at xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net presents itself as 'ติดหีหีหีหี.net' but the Open Graph metadata, canonical URL, structured data (JSON-LD), RSS feeds, and all internal navigation links reference a different brand/domain 'ติดหีหีหี.com' (xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com). The .net domain impersonates the .com domain's brand identity to capture organic traffic and redirect it. (location: page.html:162-182 - title, og:site_name, og:url, canonical, and JSON-LD all referencing xn--1-wxfc3gwbi.com while the served domain is xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net safe for AI agents to use?

xn--l3cb1eaaa2dkbbb.net currently scores 40/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.