Is xn--910bs6b83h12gvmgklgztbsw0d.weebly.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
39/100

context safety score

A score of 39/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
72
behavior
100
content
0
graph
68

7 threat patterns detected

medium

domain spoof risk

domain has spoofing indicators (punycode/confusable/highly synthetic naming)

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

critical

credential harvesting

Page contains a login form with fields labeled 'Email address' (이메일 주소) and 'Password' (비밀번호) in Korean. The password field uses type='text' instead of type='password', meaning passwords are displayed in plaintext — a deliberate harvesting technique. Form submits via POST to //www.weebly.com/weebly/apps/formSubmit.php, exfiltrating credentials to a third-party endpoint. (location: page.html:180-215, form id='form-709998930358054903')

critical

phishing

The domain uses a Punycode/IDN hostname (xn--910bs6b83h12gvmgklgztbsw0d.weebly.com) which renders as Korean characters in browsers, designed to impersonate a legitimate Korean-language service. The page presents only a bare login form with no branding, product, or service context — a classic phishing page structure targeting Korean-speaking users. (location: metadata.json:1, page.html:4, .brin-context.md:4)

high

hidden content

The real submit button is deliberately hidden with CSS (position:absolute;top:0;left:-9999px;width:1px;height:1px), replaced by a styled anchor tag. This hides the true form submission mechanism from casual inspection and bypasses some security scanners that look for visible submit buttons. (location: page.html:210-213)

medium

obfuscated code

JavaScript array of character codes [99,104,101,99,107,111,117,116,46,40,119,101,101,98,108,121,124,101,100,105,116,109,121,115,105,116,101,41,46,99,111,109] is decoded at runtime via String.fromCharCode to produce a regex pattern string. This is a common obfuscation technique to hide domain matching logic from static analysis. (location: page.html:364-374)

high

brand impersonation

The page title and navigation use Korean text '섬기는 사람' (meaning 'servant' or 'person who serves') with no visible brand identity or logo, while the OG metadata declares 'My Site' — a blank, generic shell. The Punycode domain and Korean-language credential form strongly suggest impersonation of a Korean portal or service (e.g., Naver, Kakao, or a Korean government site) without displaying identifying branding that could trigger takedown. (location: page.html:4-8, page.html:303-305)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/xn--910bs6b83h12gvmgklgztbsw0d.weebly.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is xn--910bs6b83h12gvmgklgztbsw0d.weebly.com safe for AI agents to use?

xn--910bs6b83h12gvmgklgztbsw0d.weebly.com currently scores 39/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 6, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.