Is wiziftonyq.firebaseapp.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

critical

malicious redirect

Immediate meta refresh redirect (0 seconds) to 'https://kontovalidierung.xyz/Login' — a suspicious third-party domain with a German-language login path ('kontovalidierung' = 'account validation'), strongly indicating a credential harvesting landing page. (location: page.html:14 — <meta content='0; https://kontovalidierung.xyz/Login' http-equiv='refresh'/>)

critical

credential harvesting

The redirect destination 'kontovalidierung.xyz/Login' translates to 'account validation' in German and targets a /Login endpoint, consistent with a fake login page designed to steal user credentials. (location: page.html:14 — redirect target https://kontovalidierung.xyz/Login)

high

brand impersonation

The page favicon is set to Apple's official logo from Wikimedia Commons, impersonating Apple to build false trust before redirecting victims to a credential harvesting site. (location: page.html:13 — <link href='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Apple-Apple.svg/1000px-Apple-Apple.svg.png' rel='icon'/>)

critical

phishing

HTML comment explicitly labels this as a 'GX40 - DIRECT LINK SCAMPAGE' and lists targeted email providers (Yahoo, Hotmail, Outlook, AOL, iCloud), confirming this is a purpose-built phishing kit page. Source attributed to 'www.gx40sender.com'. (location: page.html:2-10 — HTML comment block and page.html:27 — CSS comment 'GX40 - DIRECT LINK SCAMPAGE')

medium

social engineering

Page title 'Warten Sie Mal' (German: 'Wait a Moment') is a social engineering delay tactic displayed while the invisible redirect executes, preventing user suspicion during the redirection. (location: page.html:24 — <title>Warten Sie Mal</title> and page-text.txt:8)

high

hidden content

The visible page content is entirely blank/empty (only whitespace in page-text.txt) while the real malicious activity (redirect to phishing login) happens invisibly via meta refresh, deliberately hiding the page's true purpose from users. (location: page-text.txt:1-10 — no visible content rendered to user)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/wiziftonyq.firebaseapp.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is wiziftonyq.firebaseapp.com safe for AI agents to use?

wiziftonyq.firebaseapp.com currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 6, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Trust Graph

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.