Is wavebrowser.co safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

10 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

high

prompt injection

Hidden HTML element contains AI-targeting instructions

medium

social engineering

Wave Browser has a documented history as a potentially unwanted program (PUP) that installs bundled software and hijacks browser settings. The site uses environmental/charitable messaging ('Save the Ocean', '4ocean partnership') as a trust-building cover to encourage downloading a browser that has been flagged by security researchers and antivirus vendors for aggressive installation and persistence behaviors. This cause-washing technique is a classic social engineering pattern designed to lower user defenses. (location: page-text.txt:1 - hero section and throughout visible content)

medium

social engineering

The page discloses that searches are 'powered by Yahoo by default' — a hallmark of browser hijacking monetization. The framing minimizes this as a user-friendly default while burying the revenue model (search engine partnership commissions). This is deceptive presentation designed to obscure the true commercial nature of the product. (location: page-text.txt:1 - 'Searches are powered by Yahoo by default')

low

hidden content

The page embeds an audio element positioned off-screen using CSS: 'audio{left:-999999px;opacity:0;pointer-events:none;position:fixed;top:-999999px}'. Audio files (yad_dl_top_right.mp3, yad_edge.mp3, yad_firefox.mp3) are prefetched. The filenames suggest these are triggered during competing browser detection flows. This is hidden/non-visible content serving undisclosed behavioral purposes. (location: page.html:13 (inline style), page.html:94-96 (prefetch links))

medium

hidden content

The page body contains a large number of A/B test flags embedded as CSS body classes: '--v2110_on --organic_maybe --bigStub_on --t2-92_on --vuentp_on --wavwbnui_on --fourTiles_on --richSuggestions_on --sponsoredGroup_on --darkmode_on --nadm_on --newTblaTag_on --apiWaveBrowNetNTP_on --CapOneLimit_on --waveNews_on --freePro_on --4ocean_on --sidebarItemRemoval_on --fifthql_on --maxSesMatchesOverride_on --taboolaBlacklistAdsCheck_on'. Flags like 'taboolaBlacklistAdsCheck_on', 'sponsoredGroup_on', 'nadm_on', and 'CapOneLimit_on' indicate hidden ad-targeting and monetization logic not disclosed to the user. (location: page.html:157 - body class attribute)

medium

hidden content

The page exposes internal API endpoints in a publicly visible JavaScript config block: waveNewTabApi points to 'https://mywavehome.net' (a separate domain), waveCoreApi to 'https://api.wavebrowser.net', and downloadApi to 'https://download.wavebrowser.co'. The new-tab API domain 'mywavehome.net' is a separate undisclosed domain that would silently control the user's new tab page after install. (location: page.html:158 / page-text.txt:2 - window.__NUXT__.config)

medium

malicious redirect

The download infrastructure routes through 'download.wavebrowser.co' (a subdomain), and the new tab page is silently controlled by 'mywavehome.net' — a separate domain not prominently disclosed on the marketing page. Post-install, users' new tab sessions would be redirected to this undisclosed domain, enabling search hijacking and monetization without clear user consent. (location: page-text.txt:2 - window.__NUXT__.config downloadApi and waveNewTabApi values)

low

social engineering

The page includes prefetched audio files named 'yad_edge.mp3' and 'yad_firefox.mp3', suggesting targeted behavioral flows that activate when users are detected as running Edge or Firefox. This implies the site serves different persuasion content based on detected browser, a form of targeted social engineering to encourage switching away from competitor browsers. (location: page.html:95-96 - prefetch audio links)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/wavebrowser.co

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is wavebrowser.co safe for AI agents to use?

wavebrowser.co currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.