Is vuighe.cam safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
47/100

context safety score

A score of 47/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
100
content
0
graph
75

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

js obfuscation

Obfuscated document.write with encoded content

high

hidden content

The page contains a massive block of 'partner' links (50+ entries) styled with color:#000000 (black text on a dark/black background footer), rendering them invisible to users but readable by crawlers and AI agents. The links point to gambling sites (luck8.cards, xx88casino.com, abcvip.sh, go8.company, 789club.moda, sunwin.capital, 78win.food, f8bet.build, etc.), adult/pornography sites (tommorganpictures.co.uk labeled 'VLXX', thesmokersangel.co.uk labeled 'JAV', phimsex.actor labeled 'Phim Sex', hentaiz-a1.com labeled 'Sex Anime', dancesensation.co.uk labeled 'Viet69'), and sports betting sites (keonhacai55.ws, sbobet.day, xoilactv.za.com). These are deliberately hidden from human visitors via black-on-dark-background styling. (location: page.html:14969-15060 (.sys-info-block div, color:#000000 links))

high

brand impersonation

The page falsely claims to be owned and operated by studio MAPPA (a well-known Japanese anime production studio), including a hyperlink to mappa.co.jp. This is a false affiliation claim — vuighe.cam is an unauthorized Vietnamese streaming site, not affiliated with MAPPA. This misrepresents the site's legitimacy and could deceive users and AI agents into trusting the content as official. (location: page.html:669, page-text.txt:124)

medium

hidden content

CSS class .hidden-h1 uses position:absolute; left:-9999px; top:-9999px; width:1px; height:1px to render H1 content off-screen — invisible to users but accessible to scrapers, SEO crawlers, and AI agents. Combined with .luv-u (clip:rect(0,0,0,0), width:1px, height:1px) used to hide 'load more' button text, the site employs multiple off-screen/clipping techniques for hidden content injection. (location: page.html:152, page.html:158)

medium

social engineering

The site uses urgent and exaggerated marketing language ('999+ Anime NỔI BẬT 2026', 'Thương hiệu Giải trí số 1', 'Series độc quyền MIỄN PHÍ', 'FULL HD (4K)') combined with false authority claims (MAPPA affiliation, fake corporate address, DMCA badge) to manufacture credibility and drive user engagement on what is an unauthorized streaming service. (location: page.html:11-13, page.html:562, page-text.txt:123-124)

high

hidden content

Dozens of outbound links to gambling platforms (go8.company, luck8.cards, c168.design, xx88casino.com, abcvip.sh, sunwin.capital, 789club.moda, 555win35.com, 789bet.co, f8bet.build, w88.eco, sbobet.day, etc.) and adult content sites are disguised as 'partner' links with misleading display labels (e.g., 'tommorganpictures.co.uk' labeled as 'VLXX'; 'stokedrycleaners.co.uk' labeled as 'Sextop1'; 'dancesensation.co.uk' labeled as 'Viet69'). The true destinations are obfuscated by using unrelated .co.uk domains pointing to adult/gambling content — a link cloaking technique. (location: page.html:14972-15059 (.sys-info-block))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/vuighe.cam

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is vuighe.cam safe for AI agents to use?

vuighe.cam currently scores 47/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 5, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.