context safety score
A score of 48/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
tls connection failed
Could not establish TLS connection
malicious redirect
TLS connection failed (connected=false, cert_valid=false, san_match=false) on a live domain. The site cannot be reached over HTTPS, suggesting the domain may be parked, misconfigured, or serving content over plain HTTP to strip TLS protections — a common setup for phishing infrastructure or malicious redirect chains. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false)
phishing
Domain 'vshow-live.com' uses a hyphenated 'live' subdomain pattern (vshow-live.com) commonly associated with phishing and scam sites impersonating streaming or live-event platforms. The domain is only 217 days old, TLS is non-functional, and the page returned no content — consistent with a domain cycling through phishing campaigns or awaiting deployment. (location: metadata.json: domain=vshow-live.com, whois.domain_age_days=217)
brand impersonation
The domain name 'vshow-live.com' mimics the naming convention of legitimate live streaming or video show platforms (e.g., 'VShow Live'). The 'live' keyword appended via hyphen is a recognized brand-impersonation pattern used to spoof entertainment, sports, or broadcast services. (location: metadata.json: domain=vshow-live.com)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/vshow-live.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
vshow-live.com currently scores 48/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.