Is vjav.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

16 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

obfuscated code

Main ad script loaded from obfuscated filename '/afon/azazaz7.10.13.df04a0f24d7780c32f760f12117cd73e.js' with variable name 'adver' explicitly set to '7.10.13.obfuscated.js' in vONidVai config object. Obfuscation flag is self-declared in the source. (location: page.html:60-62)

medium

obfuscated code

Inline script contains minified/obfuscated JavaScript with single-character variable names (t, e, n, r, o, i, c) dynamically building and injecting a script element for the ad popunder system via 'vmh637tsxg.js'. (location: page.html:65)

high

malicious redirect

Popunder/tabunder ad system configured to open new tabs on user interaction with video player elements. Uses 'tabunder' type with force_url pointing to external ad networks (kts.bartcons.com, s.pemsrv.com). Frequency resets aggressively and binds to virtually all clickable elements including 'body' in some modes. (location: page.html:326-373)

high

malicious redirect

Push notification subscription interstitial configured with directLink 'https://online-hd.amazingcontent.site/?tag_id=93577&cl=3&click=1' embedded in two push spot configs. This redirects users who interact with the push subscription prompt to a third-party site. (location: page.html:64)

high

social engineering

'UNLOCK FULL' and 'FULL VIDEO HERE' button labels used as CTAs that redirect users to affiliate/pay sites (fhgte.com, enter.javhd.com). The button text implies content is locked and tricks users into clicking through to external paid sites. (location: page.html:73-85)

medium

social engineering

Age verification bypass logic: when referrer is not empty and URL contains promo/source params, age gate is silently bypassed by setting localStorage '_agv'=1. This circumvents age verification controls programmatically. (location: page.html:143-150)

medium

social engineering

Tab-link ads use emoji-laden titles ('🔥Uncensored JavHD', '🍑AI Undress Porn💦', '🔥AI porn') targeting users with sensational/misleading labels to drive affiliate clicks to javhd-trk.com, cmonbae.com, and candyai.gg. (location: page.html:949-1006)

medium

hidden content

DIV#app contains only '<i style="font-size:0.1px">...</i>' — a near-invisible inline element (0.1px font) used as placeholder. The actual content is injected dynamically via JavaScript, hiding page structure from static analysis and scrapers. (location: page.html:1021)

low

hidden content

window._hidden_channels = ['51'] sets a hidden channel identifier in global scope, used to suppress or modify ad delivery for specific traffic segments without visible indication to users. (location: page.html:53-54)

medium

hidden content

Client Hints (sec-ch-ua, sec-ch-ua-platform, sec-ch-ua-full-version-list, etc.) delegated to tsyndicate.com via http-equiv delegate-ch meta tag. This silently shares detailed browser/platform fingerprint data with a third-party ad syndication domain. (location: page.html:51)

medium

malicious redirect

Hardlink (direct_link) ad format loaded dynamically via AdManager spot 84723; links received via callback 'on_links_recived' are injected into page links, transparently replacing navigation targets with ad network URLs without user awareness. (location: page.html:735-748)

medium

malicious redirect

Conditional VAST ad URL 'https://kts.sensitiveclick.com/in/959/?katds_ep=...' injected into video player via pl3748.playAd() when URL contains '755071', using a long obfuscated token parameter. This silently hijacks the video ad slot for specific traffic. (location: page.html:939-943)

low

social engineering

Right-click (button===2) suppressed via stopImmediatePropagation on all click events, preventing users from inspecting links or opening context menus on ad elements — a common technique to hinder user awareness of redirect destinations. (location: page.html:824-826)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/vjav.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is vjav.com safe for AI agents to use?

vjav.com currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.