context safety score
A score of 47/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
malicious redirect
script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source
brand impersonation
The page is hosted at virtualave.net but the Cloudflare challenge zone is set to 'www.networksolutions.com' (cZone: 'www.networksolutions.com'). The domain virtualave.net is impersonating or proxying through Network Solutions' brand identity, presenting a challenge page that identifies itself as belonging to a different, well-known domain registrar/hosting brand. (location: page.html - Cloudflare _cf_chl_opt object, cZone field)
malicious redirect
The Cloudflare challenge script uses history.replaceState to silently rewrite the browser URL to '/ipage?brand=ipage&siteID=100&channelID=P99C100S653N0B5A1D0E0000V113' with affiliate/tracking parameters. This redirects users visiting virtualave.net into an iPage affiliate funnel without disclosure, manipulating browser history to obscure the redirect chain. (location: page.html - inline script, history.replaceState call with /ipage?brand=ipage&siteID=100 path)
social engineering
The page displays a Cloudflare 'Just a moment...' interstitial with 'Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue' messaging. While Cloudflare challenges are legitimate, this page is used to intercept visitors to virtualave.net and funnel them through an affiliate tracking path (/ipage?brand=ipage&siteID=100&channelID=P99C100S653N0B5A1D0E0000V113) under the guise of a security check, coercing users to enable cookies before being redirected to a monetized destination. (location: page.html - noscript block and meta refresh tag)
hidden content
The Cloudflare challenge script encodes affiliate and tracking parameters (brand=ipage, siteID=100, channelID=P99C100S653N0B5A1D0E0000V113) inside obfuscated JavaScript configuration objects (cUPMDTk, fa, and history.replaceState target URL). These parameters are not visible to users but control where they are ultimately redirected, concealing the affiliate monetization intent behind a security challenge facade. (location: page.html - _cf_chl_opt.cUPMDTk, _cf_chl_opt.fa, and history.replaceState target values)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/virtualave.netCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
virtualave.net currently scores 47/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.