context safety score
A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
social engineering
Site uses aggressive get-rich-quick language ('Hasilkan Jutaan Rupiah per Minggu' / 'Earn Millions of Rupiah per Week', 'Gratis, mudah, dan langsung bisa mulai cuan') to lure users into registering as publishers and uploading content, a classic social engineering tactic to harvest user accounts and content. (location: page.html: <section> banner overlay, <h2> and <h3> elements; page-text.txt visible text)
credential harvesting
The site presents a login page (/login) and a publisher registration flow (/register?ref=publisher) with no observable brand legitimacy, domain age unknown, WHOIS privacy redacted. The registration funnel is designed to collect user credentials and personal information under the pretense of monetization. (location: page.html: <a href='/login'>, <a href='/register?ref=publisher'>; metadata.json: domain_age_days=null, privacy_redacted=null)
brand impersonation
An external image is hotlinked directly from assets.pikiran-rakyat.com (a major Indonesian news outlet) to lend visual legitimacy and implied association with a reputable media brand without authorization, creating a false sense of credibility. (location: page.html: <img src='https://assets.pikiran-rakyat.com/crop/0x0:0x0/1200x675/photo/2024/01/12/1793837542.jpg'>)
hidden content
Multiple suspicious meta tags with hash-like names and identical name/content values are present (e.g., name='83c1a3a837d3dd8fa2f3fede1099ff405dd2fb2d' content='83c1a3a837d3dd8fa2f3fede1099ff405dd2fb2d'), along with a 'clickaine-site-verification' tag. These are non-standard meta tags indicative of ad-fraud network registration (Clickaine is a known push-notification/popunder ad network associated with malvertising) and hidden tracking/fingerprinting infrastructure. (location: page.html: <meta name='clickaine-site-verification'>, <meta name='83c1a3a837d3dd8fa2f3fede1099ff405dd2fb2d'>, <meta name='a49b024a75a9fc68ed4b1462f2f0b9f3e0652121'>)
malicious redirect
The site is verified with Clickaine, a push-notification and popunder ad network widely documented in malvertising campaigns. Users interacting with the site (especially clicking upload or register) are likely subjected to forced redirects, popunders, or push-notification subscription prompts leading to malicious destinations. (location: page.html: <meta name='clickaine-site-verification' content='169b0b63b16cef2dd79d0986d61bccee4a907ab47ee721c4ee3cb910af6bc196e25e7388e28e56095f36ec187f6e90378f1046da5894a82506487f20d26c9173'>)
phishing
The site mimics a legitimate video monetization platform (similar in concept to YouTube Partner Program) targeting Indonesian-speaking users with promises of large weekly earnings to lure them into submitting account credentials and personal data. Domain age is unknown, WHOIS is privacy-redacted, and the site has no verifiable organizational identity, matching a phishing site profile. (location: metadata.json: domain_age_days=null, privacy_redacted=null; page.html: full page structure with /login and /register?ref=publisher flows)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/vipey.coCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
vipey.co currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.