Is vidstrm.mom safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
27/100

context safety score

A score of 27/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
15
content
0
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

credential harvesting

credential form posts to an off-domain endpoint (may be legitimate SSO/OAuth)

critical

phishing

The page is hosted on vidstrm.mom but presents a login/signup form that submits credentials directly to vidoy.com (action="https://vidoy.com/signin" and action="https://vidoy.com/signup"). The site impersonates Vidoy by using Vidoy's branding, CSS, and assets while collecting credentials on a different domain, a classic cross-domain credential harvesting phishing setup. (location: page.html:71, page.html:97)

critical

credential harvesting

Sign-in form posts username and password fields via HTTP POST to https://vidoy.com/signin from a different origin domain (vidstrm.mom). Sign-up form similarly posts username, email, and password to https://vidoy.com/signup. User credentials entered on vidstrm.mom are transmitted to a third-party domain. (location: page.html:71-83, page.html:97-117)

high

brand impersonation

The site (vidstrm.mom) uses Vidoy.com's exact branding including SVG logo, CSS stylesheets loaded directly from vidoy.com (bootstrap.vidoy.css, style.vidoy.css), and footer copyright '© 2012 - 2025 Vidoy.com'. The page title is 'Vidoy' and all visual identity belongs to vidoy.com while the actual serving domain is vidstrm.mom. (location: page.html:7, page.html:28-29, page.html:165)

medium

malicious redirect

All anchor clicks on the page trigger a full-screen overlay (#overlay) that persists for 5 seconds before fading out. This overlay intercept mechanism can be used to delay user awareness of redirects or to mask navigation to malicious destinations. (location: page.html:169-189)

medium

social engineering

The page presents a convincing replica of the legitimate Vidoy.com login interface on an unrelated .mom TLD domain (vidstrm.mom), designed to deceive users into believing they are on the official site and voluntarily submitting their credentials. (location: page.html:66-123)

low

hidden content

A full-screen overlay div (#overlay) is present in the DOM with display:none and z-index:9999999. It is programmatically shown on every link click, temporarily obscuring the entire page. While used here as a loading screen, the pattern can hide malicious content or redirect activity from users and automated scanners. (location: page.html:33-37, page.html:30 (CSS #overlay definition))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/vidstrm.mom

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is vidstrm.mom safe for AI agents to use?

vidstrm.mom currently scores 27/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.