Is videw.online safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
27/100

context safety score

A score of 27/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
15
content
0
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

medium

credential harvesting

credential form posts to an off-domain endpoint (may be legitimate SSO/OAuth)

critical

credential harvesting

The page is hosted on videw.online but all form actions (signin and signup) POST credentials directly to https://vidoy.com/signin and https://vidoy.com/signup — a different domain. Users entering credentials on videw.online have their username/password/email sent to vidoy.com, which is a classic cross-domain credential harvesting pattern. (location: page.html:71 (signin form action), page.html:97 (signup form action))

high

brand impersonation

The site videw.online clones the visual identity, logo, CSS, and JS assets of vidoy.com (loading stylesheets and scripts directly from https://vidoy.com/assets/). The page title says 'Vidoy' and the footer copyright reads '© 2012 - 2025 Vidoy.com', while the actual domain is videw.online — a typosquat/lookalike domain designed to impersonate vidoy.com. (location: page.html:7 (title), page.html:28-29 (asset links from vidoy.com), page.html:165 (footer copyright))

critical

phishing

videw.online is a lookalike domain for vidoy.com (transposition of 'e' and 'w'), presenting a fully functional login and registration page that visually mimics the legitimate vidoy.com site. The domain was likely registered to intercept users who mistype or are directed to videw.online instead of vidoy.com. (location: metadata.json (domain: videw.online), page.html:71,97)

high

malicious redirect

Form submissions for both sign-in and sign-up redirect the browser to vidoy.com after credential submission (via form action URLs). This creates a seamless phishing flow: user submits credentials to vidoy.com from the fake domain, and may be transparently forwarded, masking the credential theft. Additionally, all CSS/JS assets are loaded cross-origin from vidoy.com, meaning the operator of videw.online does not control the full page behavior. (location: page.html:71 (action=https://vidoy.com/signin), page.html:97 (action=https://vidoy.com/signup))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/videw.online

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is videw.online safe for AI agents to use?

videw.online currently scores 27/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.