Is uakinogo.online safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
40/100

context safety score

A score of 40/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
80
content
0
graph
30

12 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

exfiltration

JavaScript intercepts form submissions to exfiltrate data

high

brand impersonation

The site uakinogo.online presents itself as the 'official' KinoGo (КиноГо) streaming service, explicitly using the title 'KinoGo.online смотреть фильмы и сериалы онлайн на официальном КиноГо' and branding, while operating on a different domain (uakinogo.online vs kinogo.biz/kinogo.ec). The ad injection element references 'data-cp-host' pointing to kinogo.biz, and the nav bar links to kinogo.ec as 'КиноГо / Топ', indicating this is an unofficial clone impersonating the legitimate KinoGo brand. (location: page.html:5-6, line 70, line 1392)

high

malicious redirect

A dynamic script loader fetches and executes JavaScript from two suspicious third-party domains — cvt-s1.agl010.pro and cvt-s1.agl008.shop — using an obfuscated fallback chain. These domains are not recognizable CDN or analytics providers; the pattern (short-lived .pro/.shop TLDs, opaque hash-named JS files, silent fetch-and-eval) is characteristic of adware or malvertising redirect chains. Scripts are fetched at runtime and injected directly into the document head without any integrity check. (location: page.html:1751-1754)

high

obfuscated code

The dynamic script loader uses a self-invoking obfuscated function with minified variable names and a two-URL fallback pattern to silently fetch and eval remote JavaScript (cvt-s1.agl010.pro and cvt-s1.agl008.shop). The fetched content is set as textContent of a script element and appended to document.head, then immediately removed — a classic technique to evade static analysis and inject arbitrary code without leaving persistent DOM traces. (location: page.html:1750-1755)

medium

hidden content

All script tags on the page use a non-standard type attribute 'f94f667192f96a93522e824a-text/javascript' instead of the standard 'text/javascript'. This causes browsers to skip native execution of these scripts, while Cloudflare Rocket Loader (rocket-loader.min.js, data-cf-settings matching the same token) re-executes them selectively. This technique obscures which scripts run and in what order from static analysis tools and security scanners. (location: page.html:1477, 1534-1535, 1575, 1738, 1750)

medium

hidden content

An invisible 1x1 iframe is injected into the document body via inline JavaScript. The iframe is positioned absolutely at top:0/left:0 with visibility:hidden and no border, and a script is written into its document that loads '/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js'. While this is a Cloudflare bot-detection pattern, the technique of using a hidden iframe to load and execute scripts is also a common method for covert content injection and tracking. (location: page.html:1759)

medium

brand impersonation

The ad branding element injects an ad network tag (class '604c7625') with data-cp-host referencing 'kinogo.biz', while the actual page domain is uakinogo.online. This cross-domain ad injection leverages the KinoGo brand identity to serve third-party ads without the legitimate brand owner's evident control, potentially exposing users to malvertising under a trusted brand name. (location: page.html:70)

medium

social engineering

The site presents itself as a free, unlimited, registration-free movie streaming platform ('дивитися фільми онлайн безкоштовно та без будь-яких обмежень', 'без реєстрації та відправки смс') while simultaneously providing a login/registration form that collects username and password. This creates a false sense of no-registration-required safety to lower user guard before prompting credential entry. (location: page.html:1480-1491, page-text.txt:1416-1426)

medium

credential harvesting

The site hosts a login form that submits credentials (login_name, login_password) via POST to the same page (action='') on an unofficial clone domain (uakinogo.online). Users who believe they are logging into the legitimate KinoGo service may instead be submitting credentials to an unaffiliated operator. The login hash 'dle_login_hash' is also exposed in JavaScript on the page. (location: page.html:1483-1489, 1539)

low

hidden content

The DNS prefetch directives in the page head reference four external domains (cdn77.aj2517.bid, cdn77.srv224.com, v206.cinemap.cc, video.cinemap.cc) that are not visibly referenced elsewhere in the HTML. The .bid TLD domain (cdn77.aj2517.bid) is particularly associated with ad networks and malvertising infrastructure. These prefetches establish early network connections to third-party ad/video CDN hosts before any visible content loads. (location: page.html:59-62)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/uakinogo.online

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is uakinogo.online safe for AI agents to use?

uakinogo.online currently scores 40/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.