context safety score
A score of 40/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
cloaking
Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay
brand impersonation
The page at toto12imperial.net is built using the full HTML/CSS/JS template of the legitimate e-commerce platform Ubuy (ubuy.com), including its exact UI components, CDN assets (d3ulwu8fab47va.cloudfront.net, d2ati23fc66y9j.cloudfront.net, ubuyanalytics.ubuy.com), GTM tag GTM-KFBPZ6R, store-switcher logic, cart data functions, and footer branding. The actual content is an Indonesian online gambling (togel) site (TOTO12) injected into this cloned Ubuy shell to appear as a legitimate e-commerce product listing. (location: page.html:1-1699 (entire page structure))
malicious redirect
Every navigational link on the page (logo, search form action, all category links, header Sign In / Create Account, footer links, social media links, 'Sign in' and 'Create Account' dropdowns, sidebar DAFTAR/LOGIN buttons) redirects to https://crackhomes.com/idm-serial-number-crack/ — a third-party domain associated with software crack distribution. Users clicking any link on this page are redirected to that external malicious site regardless of the label shown. (location: page.html:173,180,191-285,362-363,398-399,761-768,816-953,1011-1036)
malicious redirect
The LOGIN and DAFTAR (Register) call-to-action buttons link to https://assetlandingpages.xyz/crackhomes/ — a suspicious domain (assetlandingpages.xyz) that is distinct from the stated site domain. This domain is used for the canonical URL, AMP link, and Twitter/Apple app deep links as well, redirecting users who attempt to log in or register away from the ostensible site. (location: page.html:48,362-363,687-688,761-768)
phishing
The page mimics a legitimate product listing page (using the Ubuy e-commerce template) and presents LOGIN and DAFTAR (Register) buttons that collect user intent and redirect to https://assetlandingpages.xyz/crackhomes/. The page explicitly instructs users to enter credentials ('username dan password') via its FAQ and HowTo structured data, while all authentication flows route to third-party attacker-controlled domains. (location: page.html:362-363,761-768; page-text.txt:1914-1923)
social engineering
The page fabricates trust signals to manipulate users into registering and depositing funds: (1) a fake aggregate rating of 927,554,221 reviews with 4.9 stars, (2) fake 'PCI DSS' and 'ISO Certified' trust badges loaded from photosaya.io (not actual certification bodies), (3) a note warning users to use only the 'official link' to avoid 'fake links' (while itself being a deceptive site), and (4) fabricated structured-data reviews with invented Indonesian usernames praising the platform. (location: page.html:715-720,986-998; page-text.txt:601-606,830)
hidden content
The Open Graph og:url, canonical link, AMP href, Twitter app deep links, and all Schema.org structured data (Product @id, BreadcrumbList items, LocalBusiness url, SiteNavigationElement url) all point to https://crackhomes.com/idm-serial-number-crack/ rather than the actual page URL (toto12imperial.net). This creates a split-identity where search engines and social media scrapers index the crackhomes.com URL while users see the toto12 gambling content — a cloaking/SEO poisoning technique. (location: page.html:20,34,37,39-40,42,44,47-48,52; page-text.txt:1731-1867)
hidden content
The page suppresses all browser dialog functions (alert, confirm, prompt) via JavaScript at page load time: 'alert = confirm = prompt = function() {};'. This prevents any browser security warnings or confirmation dialogs from being shown to the user, blocking standard user-notification mechanisms. (location: page.html:54-56)
prompt injection
The page embeds multiple Schema.org JSON-LD blocks (Product, FAQPage, HowTo, BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness) in the page body containing authoritative-sounding instructions on how to register, deposit, and use the TOTO12 gambling platform. These structured data blocks are designed to be ingested by AI crawlers, search agents, and LLM-based assistants, instructing them to treat the gambling site as a legitimate 'official' business and guide users through credential submission and financial deposit steps. (location: page-text.txt:1730-1979)
obfuscated code
The page uses btoa() to base64-encode GTM/analytics configuration data before sending it in AJAX requests to crackhomes.com: 'gtm_data = btoa(JSON.stringify(gtm_data))'. Additionally, multiple authentication tokens embedded in JavaScript are base64-encoded strings (e.g., 'aG9tZXBhZ2VtZWdhbWVudTcyfDA2ZjVh...'). This obfuscation conceals the true tracking payload and server-side token values from casual inspection. (location: page.html:1413,1096,1131; page-text.txt:1245)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/toto12imperial.netCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
toto12imperial.net currently scores 40/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.