context safety score
A score of 48/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
encoded payload
suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content
malicious redirect
script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source
brand impersonation
The site operates as 'The RarBg' (therarbg.com), directly impersonating the defunct RARBG torrent site brand. It replicates RARBG's name, logo, categories, and site structure to attract users who trust the original brand, which was shut down in 2023. (location: page.html:7, page.html:95, metadata.json:domain)
malicious redirect
A third-party JavaScript file is loaded from the unrecognized external domain 'finestmortifyfertility.com' (//finestmortifyfertility.com/6c/1f/3c/6c1f3c85c99e62eb028505b3f6b22cd4.js). This domain has a suspicious algorithmically-generated name characteristic of malvertising and malware distribution networks. The script is loaded with no integrity check (no SRI hash) and can execute arbitrary code, redirect users, or harvest data. (location: page.html:49)
hidden content
A hidden 1x1 pixel iframe is injected into the document body via an inline Cloudflare challenge script. While partially attributable to Cloudflare bot detection, the pattern (absolute-positioned, 0 visibility, 1px dimensions) is also a known technique for hidden content injection and tracking. The iframe dynamically creates and appends scripts to itself. (location: page.html:220)
social engineering
The Apps category prominently lists cracked and pre-activated software torrents (CorelDRAW 2026 Crack, IDM Crack Lifetime, Topaz Photo Pro Pre-Activated, Folder Colorizer Crack, TreeSize Professional Fix Crack). These entice users to download files that commonly bundle malware, ransomware, or credential-stealing payloads under the guise of free software. (location: page.html:4527-4898)
hidden content
A Tor/onion address is published in a meta http-equiv='onion-location' header, routing users to a .onion mirror (therarbgscpvql6p2e3upz7xyqb4ornupyznim5rlriycjfvcwnz7ayd.onion). While not inherently malicious, this facilitates anonymous access and is used to evade legal oversight and network-level content filtering. (location: page.html:36)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/therarbg.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
therarbg.com currently scores 48/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.