Is tatamotors.com safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
48/100

context safety score

A score of 48/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
80
content
20
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

obfuscated code

Heavily obfuscated JavaScript block using a custom string-rotation decoder (resizetmotor_0xa2b81d / resizetmotor_0x2fb1 / resizetmotor_0x2bc3) with hex-encoded string arrays and self-shuffling logic. When decoded, the script fires on window.onload, reads window.location.hostname, constructs an img tag with display:none pointing to https://logo.page-source.com/resizeimage.ashx with the hostname embedded as a parameter, and injects it into document.body. This is a covert beacon/tracking pixel injected via obfuscated code that exfiltrates the visitor's hostname to a third-party domain not affiliated with Tata Motors. (location: page.html:line 83 — inline <script> block in <head>)

high

hidden content

A zero-dimension tracking pixel (width='0' height='0', display:none) is dynamically constructed and injected into document.body by the obfuscated script. The pixel calls https://logo.page-source.com/resizeimage.ashx?ig=<hostname>&sz=282401 — an external, non-Tata domain — silently beaconing the page hostname on every page load without any user awareness or consent disclosure. (location: page.html:line 83 — decoded payload of obfuscated onload handler, injected into document.body)

medium

malicious redirect

The link 'https://www.globalservices.tatamotors/' (missing TLD — not a valid URL) is used as a 'Visit Website' href for 'Tata Motors Global Services Ltd.' This malformed URL could resolve unexpectedly in some browsers or be used for typosquatting/redirect abuse, and does not match the expected domain pattern (tatamotors.com). (location: page.html:line 453 — <a href="https://www.globalservices.tatamotors/">)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/tatamotors.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is tatamotors.com safe for AI agents to use?

tatamotors.com currently scores 48/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.