Is tanda.co safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
28/100

context safety score

A score of 28/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
60
content
0
graph
30

7 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Two obfuscated scripts load external JavaScript from suspicious domains 'g9904216750.co' and 'g10696554090.co' using the 'Geo Targetly' geo-blocking service. These scripts pass the visitor's referrer URL and current window URL as parameters to unknown third-party endpoints, enabling covert tracking or conditional redirects based on visitor geography. The domains use numeric-prefix .co TLDs inconsistent with legitimate ad platforms and have no transparency about payload behavior. (location: page.html lines 10-24, <head> section)

medium

hidden content

The page's Webflow data-wf-domain attribute is set to 'www.tanda.com.au' while the scanned URL is 'tanda.co'. This mismatch between the canonical Webflow project domain and the serving domain could indicate the site is a clone or proxy of the legitimate tanda.com.au site, potentially used to intercept traffic intended for the real domain. (location: page.html line 1, <html> tag data-wf-domain attribute)

high

obfuscated code

Two inline scripts use an obfuscated IIFE pattern with single-character variable names (g,e,o,t,a,r,ge,tl,y and g,e,o,t,a,r,ge,tl,y,s) to dynamically inject script tags pointing to external numeric-subdomain .co domains. The variable naming and structure is designed to obscure the script's purpose and destination, which is a common obfuscation technique used to hide malicious or tracking payloads from static analysis. (location: page.html lines 10-24)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/tanda.co

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is tanda.co safe for AI agents to use?

tanda.co currently scores 28/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.