Is tamilsexzone.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
30/100

context safety score

A score of 30/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
30
content
0
graph
70

14 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

medium

cloaking

Page checks user-agent for bot/crawler strings to serve different content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Back-button hijacking script pushes 10 history states then intercepts the popstate event to forcibly redirect users to https://backbutton.videobaba.xyz/back-button-script/public/getit.php?site=TSZ — an external third-party redirect service. Triggered for any visitor not arriving from tamilsexzone itself, trapping users in a navigation loop. (location: page.html:837-855 (inline script), page-text.txt:595-612)

medium

malicious redirect

Third-party ad script dynamically injected from https://www.namastedharma.com/ATByhs5.js and https://www.namastedharma.com/iIG0dX4.js via an inline loader. These are obfuscated ad-network scripts loaded after age-gate interaction, with no integrity checks (no SRI), posing a risk of drive-by redirect or malvertising payloads. (location: page.html:196-235 (inline loadAds script))

medium

malicious redirect

Ad iframe loaded from https://blazingserver.net/revive/www/delivery/afr.php?zoneid=446 embedded in page header with allow='autoplay'. Cross-origin ad iframe from an unverified ad server; the corresponding click-through also routes through blazingserver.net, a non-transparent ad intermediary. (location: page.html:283)

medium

hidden content

A <link rel='preconnect'> to https://www.bollyocean.com/ is present in the page head. This silently pre-connects the browser to an external adult domain not visible to the user, leaking browser fingerprint and IP to a third party without disclosure. (location: page.html:145)

medium

hidden content

Client hint delegation header delegates detailed browser/device metadata (sec-ch-ua, sec-ch-ua-arch, sec-ch-ua-model, sec-ch-ua-platform, sec-ch-ua-full-version-list, sec-ch-ua-mobile, sec-ch-ua-bitness) to https://tsyndicate.com — a third-party ad/tracking network — without user awareness. This silently exposes granular device fingerprint data to an external party. (location: page.html:195 (meta http-equiv='delegate-ch'))

low

hidden content

Analytics beacon loaded from https://stats.indianpornempire.com/js/script.js using a defer script tag. This is a first-party-branded but third-party-hosted analytics tracker that silently reports page visits to indianpornempire.com, a separate adult network domain, without explicit user consent notice on the page. (location: page.html:192)

medium

obfuscated code

Custom base64 encode/decode functions (b2a, a2b, b64e, b64d) are defined inline and used throughout the ad-insertion framework to encode/decode ad block data and tracking attributes at runtime. This obscures ad injection targets, tracking payloads, and click-handler logic from static analysis. (location: page.html:970-973 (inline script), page-text.txt:728-730)

low

social engineering

An 'AI Porn Video' menu item in the mobile navigation links to https://www.cmonbae.com/?union_id=MTE3 via an affiliate/union tracking parameter. This uses the 'AI' label as an engagement hook to drive affiliate traffic clicks, misrepresenting AI as a content feature. (location: page.html:867)

low

hidden content

Data trailer attribute for video article post-26427 contains the same MP4 URL repeated 7 consecutive times concatenated into a single malformed URL string. This anomalous data attribute duplication is inconsistent with normal CMS output and may indicate template injection or data-attribute stuffing. (location: page.html:547 (data-trailer attribute of article post-26427))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/tamilsexzone.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is tamilsexzone.com safe for AI agents to use?

tamilsexzone.com currently scores 30/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.