Is tamilscandals3.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
22/100

context safety score

A score of 22/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
30
content
0
graph
70

13 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

medium

cloaking

Page checks user-agent for bot/crawler strings to serve different content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Back-button hijacking script pushes 10 history states then intercepts popstate to force-redirect external visitors to https://backbutton.videobaba.xyz/back-button-script/public/getit.php?site=TS, trapping users and redirecting them to an external destination on browser back navigation. (location: page.html:1461-1472 and page.html:1617-1629 (DOMContentLoaded event handler))

medium

malicious redirect

Navigation menu items 'Live sex' and 'Indian Sex Cams' link directly through blazingserver.net redirectAd plugin endpoints (e.g. https://blazingserver.net/revive/www/admin/plugins/redirectAd/redirect.php?zoneid=209 and ?zoneid=208), routing users through an opaque third-party redirect ad system. (location: page.html:265 and page.html:322)

medium

hidden content

The meta http-equiv='delegate-ch' tag delegates extensive browser client hints (sec-ch-ua, sec-ch-ua-bitness, sec-ch-ua-arch, sec-ch-ua-model, sec-ch-ua-platform, sec-ch-ua-platform-version, sec-ch-ua-full-version, sec-ch-ua-full-version-list, sec-ch-ua-mobile) to tsyndicate.com, enabling detailed hardware/software fingerprinting of visitors by a third-party ad network without visible disclosure. (location: page.html:60)

medium

hidden content

Visitor's real IP address (38.224.232.228) is embedded directly in the JavaScript app configuration variable exposed in page source, leaking scanner/visitor IP to any third-party scripts that access the global 'app' object. (location: page.html:1534 and page.html:1692 (app-js-extra inline script, user_ip field))

medium

obfuscated code

Custom base64 encode/decode functions (b2a, a2b, b64e, b64d) are embedded inline and used by the ad injection framework (AI plugin) to encode/decode ad block configurations and tracking data at runtime, obscuring the actual ad content and behavior from static analysis. (location: page.html:1540-1542 and page.html:1698-1700)

medium

malicious redirect

Multiple third-party ad scripts loaded from namastedharma.com (//www.namastedharma.com/QaHyPI3.js and //www.namastedharma.com/cMCNdb0.js) with data-spots and data-subid1 tracking parameters. These are external scripts with full DOM access and no integrity checks, capable of performing redirects or injecting content. (location: page.html:1580-1581)

low

hidden content

Analytics/tracking script loaded from stats.indianpornempire.com (https://stats.indianpornempire.com/js/script.js) silently tracks all visitors. The domain name is distinct from the site domain, functioning as a covert cross-site tracker associated with the Indian Porn Empire ad network. (location: page.html:59)

low

obfuscated code

Inline IPEA ad loader dynamically creates iframes pointing to https://a.videobaba.xyz/OX/TS/d-ts.php and https://a.vartoken.com/OX/SS/d-ss-v2.php, using obfuscated spot/affID parameters. The ad content loaded into these iframes is entirely controlled by external servers and not inspectable at scan time. (location: page.html:66-120)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/tamilscandals3.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is tamilscandals3.com safe for AI agents to use?

tamilscandals3.com currently scores 22/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.