Is t-bank-app.ru safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

critical

brand impersonation

Domain 't-bank-app.ru' impersonates T-Bank (Tinkoff Bank), a major Russian financial institution. The '-app' suffix and '.ru' TLD are classic typosquatting/brand-abuse patterns used to deceive users into believing they are accessing an official banking app or service. (location: domain: t-bank-app.ru)

critical

phishing

The domain 't-bank-app.ru' is highly consistent with a phishing site targeting T-Bank (Tinkoff) customers. The combination of brand name, 'app' keyword, and TLS failure (connected=false, cert_valid=false) indicates a site that either failed to load or is not serving a legitimate HTTPS service, a common characteristic of short-lived phishing infrastructure. (location: domain: t-bank-app.ru, metadata.json tls block)

high

credential harvesting

Banking brand impersonation domains of this pattern (bank-name + 'app' + country TLD) are predominantly used for credential harvesting — presenting fake login forms to steal usernames, passwords, and OTPs from banking customers. (location: domain: t-bank-app.ru)

medium

malicious redirect

TLS connection failed entirely (connected=false), which may indicate the domain is parked, rotating infrastructure, or using HTTP redirects to deliver a payload or redirect victims to another phishing stage. The page content being empty is consistent with cloaking or bot-detection evasion that serves malicious content only to targeted victims. (location: metadata.json tls.connected=false, page.html (empty))

medium

hidden content

All page content files (page.html, page-text.txt, page-hidden.txt) are completely empty despite the domain being resolvable enough to have metadata collected. This is consistent with cloaking techniques that serve empty or benign content to scanners while delivering malicious content to real users or specific geolocations. (location: page.html, page-text.txt, page-hidden.txt (all empty))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/t-bank-app.ru

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is t-bank-app.ru safe for AI agents to use?

t-bank-app.ru currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.