context safety score
A score of 47/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.
brand impersonation
The site sportfilm800.com impersonates 1XBET, a known international betting brand, displaying 'TRUSTED & RELIABLE INTERNATIONAL COMPANY' and the 1XBET name without any indication of official affiliation. The domain name (sportfilm800.com) has no relationship to 1XBET, strongly indicating unauthorized brand use to lend false legitimacy. (location: page-text.txt, page.html <title> and visible content)
social engineering
The page uses urgency and financial incentive tactics ('200% ON FIRST DEPOSIT', '+200% on first deposit', promo code 'FILM800') to pressure users into submitting personal data or making deposits. The promo code 'FILM800' mirrors the domain 'sportfilm800.com', suggesting a coordinated affiliate/scam funnel designed to manipulate users into handing over money or credentials. (location: page.html <title>, page-text.txt)
phishing
The site collects user agreement to Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy with a confirmation of age (18+), consistent with a phishing funnel harvesting personal and financial data under the guise of a bonus claim. The domain is only 168 days old and unrelated to 1XBET, yet mimics its branding to capture victims. (location: page-text.txt: 'I have read, understand and agree with the Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and confirm that I am over 18 years of age')
credential harvesting
The page presents a promo code entry flow ('Insert promo code get your bonus') that likely leads to a registration or login form collecting user credentials (email, password, payment info) under the pretense of redeeming a deposit bonus from a spoofed 1XBET brand page. (location: page-text.txt, page.html interactive form elements)
curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/sportfilm800.comCommon questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.
sportfilm800.com currently scores 47/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.
Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.
brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.
Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.
brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.
No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.
Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.
Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.
Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.
integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.