Is soap2day.day safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
34/100

context safety score

A score of 34/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
40
content
0
graph
30

11 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

brand impersonation

Site impersonates the well-known 'Soap2Day' piracy streaming brand, using its name, logo, and branding extensively. The page title explicitly references 'Soap2day.com' and 'Soap2day2' to capture search traffic for the original brand. Multiple alternate domain aliases (soap2day.day, ww25.soap2day.day, uk.soap2day.day, au.soap2day.day, 123movies.soap2day.day) suggest a coordinated brand-squatting network distributing pirated content under the Soap2Day name. (location: page.html:17, page.html:304, page.html:318)

high

malicious redirect

Third-party ad script loaded from 'bvtpk.com' via obfuscated inline JavaScript that dynamically creates and appends a script element. This pattern is commonly used by malvertising networks to inject redirects or pop-unders without direct attribution in the HTML source. (location: page.html:98)

high

malicious redirect

Ad network script loaded from 'quietleafgarden.com' — an unrecognized third-party domain injecting JavaScript (invoke.js and a hash-named .js file). These scripts run in full page context and can perform drive-by redirects, pop-ups, or malicious payload delivery. Two separate scripts from this domain are present. (location: page.html:431, page.html:700)

medium

malicious redirect

Ad/tracker script loaded from 'yw.noritesfarrago.com' via an async script tag embedded mid-content. This is an unrecognized third-party ad network domain with a randomly-generated-looking subdomain, consistent with malvertising infrastructure used for redirects or ad fraud. (location: page.html:324)

medium

hidden content

Yandex Metrica tracking pixel loaded via a noscript tag with inline image positioned off-screen at 'position:absolute; left:-9999px'. This off-screen pixel is invisible to users and used for covert behavioral tracking and fingerprinting of visitors without consent disclosure. (location: page.html:659)

medium

social engineering

Page contains deliberate social engineering text designed to build false trust: claims the site has been 'verified by Eset, VirusTotal, McAfee, Avast, Norton, F-Secure', pre-emptively addresses user skepticism ('You might think these guys seem suspicious'), and promotes sideloading an Android APK from unknown sources ('you'll need to allow installation from unknown sources'). This is a classic technique to lower user security defenses. (location: page-text.txt:270-272, page.html:369-373)

medium

social engineering

App section encourages users to download an Android APK ('Soap 2day 2026 official apk') that requires enabling installation from unknown sources — bypassing Android's built-in security controls. This is a known vector for distributing malware-laced APKs under the guise of a trusted brand. (location: page.html:367-369, page-text.txt:267-269)

medium

obfuscated code

The bvtpk.com script injection uses a self-invoking obfuscated pattern: '(function(s){s.dataset.zone=...,s.src=...})([document.documentElement, document.body].filter(Boolean).pop().appendChild(...))' — deliberately obscuring the script injection to evade static analysis. This is a recognized obfuscation technique used by malvertising networks. (location: page.html:98)

low

hidden content

Footer contains keyword-stuffed tag links ('soap2day', 'soap 2day', 'soaptoday', 'soap today', 'soap2day is', 'soup2day') all pointing to the root URL. These are SEO manipulation anchors designed to influence search engine rankings and direct search traffic from competing/variant brand spellings to this site. (location: page.html:537-542)

low

brand impersonation

Page title and meta description reference multiple competing brand names ('Soaptoday', 'Soap 2 Day', 'Soap2say', 'HDtoday', 'Soaper TV', '123Movies') to harvest search traffic from users looking for those separate brands, constituting multi-brand impersonation for SEO manipulation. (location: page.html:17, page.html:20)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/soap2day.day

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is soap2day.day safe for AI agents to use?

soap2day.day currently scores 34/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.