Is skyscannerplatform.net safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
48/100

context safety score

A score of 48/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
45
behavior
100
content
40
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

high

brand impersonation

Domain 'skyscannerplatform.net' impersonates the legitimate Skyscanner brand (skyscanner.com/skyscanner.net) by appending 'platform' to the brand name on a different TLD. This is a classic typosquat/brand-abuse pattern used to deceive users and AI agents into believing they are interacting with an official Skyscanner property. (location: domain: skyscannerplatform.net)

high

phishing

The combination of a brand-impersonating domain, TLS failure (TLS not connected, cert invalid), and an otherwise empty page is consistent with a phishing infrastructure site — either dormant, under construction, or serving content conditionally to avoid automated scanners. The domain is ready to host credential-harvesting or deceptive content targeting Skyscanner users. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false)

medium

credential harvesting

Brand-impersonation domains mimicking travel platforms like Skyscanner are frequently used to harvest login credentials, payment card data, or booking information from victims who believe they are on the legitimate site. No active harvesting form was detected (page is empty), but the infrastructure is consistent with this threat pattern. (location: domain: skyscannerplatform.net)

medium

hidden content

The page returns no visible content and no hidden content despite the domain being live enough to have WHOIS data. This blank-page behavior is commonly used to serve malicious content only to real human visitors or targeted user-agents while appearing benign to automated scanners, bots, and AI agents. (location: page.html (empty), page-text.txt (empty), page-hidden.txt (empty))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/skyscannerplatform.net

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is skyscannerplatform.net safe for AI agents to use?

skyscannerplatform.net currently scores 48/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.