Is seks.ws safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
46/100

context safety score

A score of 46/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
80
content
17
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

high

obfuscated code

Large heavily obfuscated JavaScript block present in a <script data-cfasync="false"> tag. Uses a rotating array self-invoking obfuscator pattern (while(!![]){...O["push"](O["shift"]())}) with hex-encoded property lookups and string-splitting to conceal its true behavior. True payload (likely ad injection, tracking, or redirect logic) cannot be determined without deobfuscation. (location: page.html:198)

medium

hidden content

jQuery script tag uses a non-standard MIME type attribute (type="7593fe690cb64e59b791b8b0-text/javascript") which prevents the browser from executing it natively but allows Cloudflare Rocket Loader or similar loaders to selectively execute it. The LiveInternet counter script uses the same custom type, indicating deliberate deferred/hidden script execution pattern. (location: page.html:8, page.html:191)

low

hidden content

LiveInternet counter pixel uses a 1x1 base64-encoded transparent GIF (data:image/gif;base64,...) with its src dynamically replaced by script, leaking the page URL, referrer, title, and screen resolution to counter.yadro.ru (a Russian analytics/tracking service). This constitutes covert user tracking without disclosure. (location: page.html:187-196)

medium

social engineering

Search history section ('Son Axtarış') surfaces queries referencing minors (e.g., 'Azeri uşaq aqlaması' meaning 'Azerbaijani child crying', 'mekdeblilrr' meaning 'schoolchildren', 'Qizi ilk defe sikir' meaning 'fucking a girl for the first time') which may be used to normalize or funnel users toward CSAM-adjacent content, and could serve as SEO bait to attract vulnerable users. (location: page.html:173-174, page-text.txt:141)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/seks.ws

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is seks.ws safe for AI agents to use?

seks.ws currently scores 46/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.