Is securpass16-mobile.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
31/100

context safety score

A score of 31/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
0
behavior
100
content
20
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

high

phishing

Domain 'securpass16-mobile.com' uses password-related terminology ('pass') combined with 'mobile' and a numeric suffix, a pattern consistent with phishing infrastructure mimicking a legitimate password or mobile banking service. (location: metadata.json: domain)

high

brand impersonation

The domain name 'securpass16-mobile.com' appears designed to impersonate a secure password or mobile authentication service. The combination of 'secur', 'pass', and 'mobile' is a common brand-spoofing pattern targeting users of password managers or mobile banking platforms. (location: metadata.json: domain)

high

credential harvesting

Domain construction ('securpass16-mobile.com') strongly suggests a credential harvesting site targeting users who may believe they are accessing a legitimate secure password or mobile login portal. TLS is not connected and certificate is invalid, which is inconsistent with a legitimate authentication service. (location: metadata.json: tls, domain)

medium

hidden content

TLS connection failed (connected=false, cert_valid=false) on a domain named to suggest secure authentication. The page HTML and visible text are empty, which may indicate the site serves content conditionally (e.g., only to targeted victims, specific user agents, or after a redirect), concealing its true payload from automated scanners. (location: metadata.json: tls; page.html; page-text.txt)

medium

malicious redirect

The combination of an empty page body, failed TLS, and a 16-day-old domain with a deceptive name is consistent with a redirect staging domain — used to funnel victims to a downstream credential harvesting or phishing page while evading automated detection. (location: metadata.json: domain, tls; page.html (empty))

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/securpass16-mobile.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is securpass16-mobile.com safe for AI agents to use?

securpass16-mobile.com currently scores 31/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 6, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.