Is sarkariresult.com.cm safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
37/100

context safety score

A score of 37/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
50
content
0
graph
70

12 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

cloaking

Page checks user-agent for bot/crawler strings to serve different content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

brand impersonation

The domain sarkariresult.com.cm uses a .cm TLD (Cameroon) to impersonate the well-known Indian government job portal SarkariResult.com. The site explicitly claims to be 'the official website of Sarkari Result' and presents itself as an authoritative source for Indian government exam results, jobs, and admit cards, while the disclaimer buried at the bottom admits it is not associated with any official or government websites. (location: page.html:18, page.html:682, page-text.txt:434)

high

social engineering

The site falsely and prominently claims 'SarkariResult.com.cm is the official website of Sarkari Result' targeting Indian job-seekers who search for government exam results. This deceptive authority claim is designed to build false trust among users seeking sensitive government information such as exam results, admit cards, and job applications. The disclaimer contradicting this claim is buried and not prominently displayed. (location: page.html:682, page-text.txt:434, page-text.txt:439)

medium

brand impersonation

The site's title, meta tags, og:site_name, and schema.org markup all assert 'Sarkari Result' branding and present the .com.cm domain as the canonical/official source. The JSON-LD schema even labels the page type as 'NewsArticle' and 'SearchResultsPage' with the headline 'Sarkari Result, Sarkari Result 2025 | Sarkari Results | Sarkariresult' — mimicking the presentation of the legitimate sarkariresult.com site to deceive search engines and AI agents indexing or summarizing this content. (location: page.html:18, page.html:33)

medium

social engineering

The site collects WhatsApp channel subscriptions (https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaAbQf01NCrYADMLt00L) by presenting itself as an official government results notification service. Users who subscribe expecting official government notifications are exposed to a third-party actor's channel under a false official identity. (location: page.html:295, page-text.txt:59)

medium

hidden content

Inline CSS in the page body embeds <style> blocks directly inside <p> tags (page.html lines 698-723, 745-775), which is non-standard and used to inject styling outside the head. This technique can be used to hide or overlay content that is rendered differently by browsers versus scrapers/AI agents, and is consistent with cloaking or hidden content injection patterns. (location: page.html:698-723, page.html:745-775)

medium

obfuscated code

The page contains a custom base64 encode/decode implementation (b2a, a2b, b64e, b64d functions) used by the Ad Inserter plugin to dynamically decode and inject ad code at runtime. The b64d function decodes base64-encoded content and injects it into the DOM via createContextualFragment, which is a common technique for hiding the true nature of injected code from static scanners. This appears in both the inline script block and the footer script block. (location: page.html:794-796, page-text.txt:794-796)

low

malicious redirect

Several internal navigation links and 'View More' buttons use HTTP (not HTTPS) URLs (e.g., http://sarkariresult.com.cm/result/, http://sarkariresult.com.cm/admit-card/) mixed with HTTPS canonical and og:url declarations. This HTTP/HTTPS inconsistency on a site presenting as an authoritative government portal could expose users to downgrade attacks or redirect interception, though this may also be a configuration oversight. (location: page.html:426, page.html:465, page.html:504, page.html:533)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/sarkariresult.com.cm

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is sarkariresult.com.cm safe for AI agents to use?

sarkariresult.com.cm currently scores 37/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.