Is rupalipalace.co.uk safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
50
content
0
graph
30

11 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

critical

malicious redirect

The page is served at rupalipalace.co.uk (a UK restaurant domain) but all canonical URLs, assets, links, and branding point to legoutrmets.com — a Vietnamese adult content site. The canonical tag explicitly redirects crawlers and agents to https://legoutrmets.com/. This is a domain hijack/cloaking arrangement where a legitimate-seeming UK domain silently delivers a completely different site's content. (location: page.html:11 — <link rel="canonical" href="https://legoutrmets.com/">)

critical

obfuscated code

A large obfuscated JavaScript block labeled '<!--PUPUNDER-->' uses decodeURI on a heavily encoded string, applies a Caesar-cipher-style character rotation (charCode offset by position mod 95), then reconstructs and executes a popunder/redirect payload at runtime. The decoded logic drives forced popup/redirect behaviour to gambling and adult sites. The obfuscation is specifically designed to evade static analysis. (location: page.html:36 — <script data-cfasync="false">!function(){"use strict";for(var n=decodeURI("wd%60andp%5E...)

high

malicious redirect

JavaScript popup configuration opens random URLs from ['https://jun8899.me/sextop2', 'https://mb6688.me/sextop2MB66'] in new tabs on user click, with a 10-second initial delay and 60-second interval. These are affiliate/gambling redirect links triggered covertly on any page interaction, without user consent or disclosure. (location: page.html:44-92 — popupConfig links array and handleClick/openPopup functions)

high

malicious redirect

An external script is loaded from //bodybossmotivate.com/on.js with callbacks to jdzby() — a function defined within the obfuscated PUPUNDER block. This third-party script is part of the popunder ad network infrastructure and executes arbitrary external code on page load. (location: page.html:37 — <script data-cfasync="false" data-clocid="2030212" async src="//bodybossmotivate.com/on.js">)

high

hidden content

A third-party ad script from waust.at (a known adware/traffic monetisation network) is loaded silently: _wau.push(['classic','7y0cufjq58','xis']). This tracker/ad injector runs invisibly with no user-visible disclosure and is associated with popunder and redirect ad networks. (location: page.html:24 — <script id="_wauxis">var _wau = _wau || []; _wau.push([...]))

medium

hidden content

A conditional script dynamically appends an external ad script from vipads.live (vn/FD2635C2-E5F4-1993-33-E9455AE179BE.blpha) only when window.innerWidth < 500 (mobile devices). This targeted payload injection is hidden from desktop analysis and serves a different ad/redirect payload specifically to mobile users. (location: page.html:132-138 — conditional script injecting vipads.live source on mobile)

medium

hidden content

A commented-out script tag references https://www.vipads.live/vn/A4FA082A-2351-1993-33-DBDDC45340F3.blpha under a 'CATFIT BANNER' comment. While commented out in HTML, the mobile-targeted block above loads a different vipads.live GUID, suggesting rotation of ad payloads. The .blpha extension is non-standard and indicative of obfuscated ad payload delivery. (location: page.html:39-41 — <!-- CATFIT BANNER commented block referencing vipads.live -->)

medium

social engineering

The page targets searches including 'Hoc Sinh Bi Lua' (students being deceived/tricked), 'Gai Non' (underage girls), 'hiep em' (assault/rape), and 'em gai moi lon long con chua moc' (very young girls). These search terms suggest the site is used to attract users seeking content involving minors or non-consensual scenarios, which constitutes exploitation-based social engineering and potential CSAM facilitation. (location: page.html:623-643 — recent search terms section)

medium

brand impersonation

The domain rupalipalace.co.uk is an established UK business (domain age 14,833 days, ~40 years) being used to serve content for legoutrmets.com. The page HTML, metadata, canonical links, and all branding are entirely from legoutrmets.com. The legitimate rupalipalace.co.uk brand is being exploited to lend credibility or hosting cover to the adult/gambling content operation. (location: metadata.json + page.html:11-20 — domain mismatch between rupalipalace.co.uk and all canonical/OG references to legoutrmets.com)

low

hidden content

Cookie-based click tracking silently counts body clicks (setCookie 'bodyClicked') and ad suppression timestamps ('adsHiddenUntil') to control ad visibility and evade detection. After 4 clicks ads are suppressed, which can also be used to hide malicious content from automated scanners that simulate clicks. (location: page.html:142-198 — setCookie/getCookie click tracking and handleAdVisibility logic)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/rupalipalace.co.uk

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is rupalipalace.co.uk safe for AI agents to use?

rupalipalace.co.uk currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.