Is revolut.codes safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
45/100

context safety score

A score of 45/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
60
content
20
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

brand impersonation

Domain 'revolut.codes' uses the name of Revolut, a major fintech/banking brand, with a non-standard TLD (.codes instead of revolut.com). This is a classic typosquat/brand-impersonation pattern targeting Revolut customers or automated agents interacting with Revolut services. (location: metadata.json: domain=revolut.codes)

high

phishing

The domain 'revolut.codes' closely mimics the legitimate Revolut brand (revolut.com) using an alternative TLD. Combined with Cloudflare-gated access and no visible content, this is consistent with a phishing site withholding its payload until a human/bot passes the challenge — a common evasion technique for credential-harvesting phishing pages targeting Revolut users. (location: page.html: title='Just a moment...', cZone='www.revolut.codes')

medium

malicious redirect

The page contains a meta http-equiv='refresh' with content='360', causing an automatic page reload/redirect after 360 seconds. Combined with Cloudflare challenge scripting that dynamically rewrites the URL via history.replaceState and appends challenge tokens, the page orchestrates a redirect chain (?__cf_chl_rt_tk=...) that could forward victims to a phishing payload after challenge completion. (location: page.html: <meta http-equiv='refresh' content='360'> and history.replaceState call)

high

credential harvesting

The domain impersonates Revolut (a financial services company) and is actively protected behind a Cloudflare managed challenge gate. This gating is frequently used by phishing operators to hide credential-harvesting login forms from automated scanners while presenting them to real users who pass the CAPTCHA challenge. (location: page.html: _cf_chl_opt cType='managed', cZone='www.revolut.codes')

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/revolut.codes

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is revolut.codes safe for AI agents to use?

revolut.codes currently scores 45/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.