Is portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
41/100

context safety score

A score of 41/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
70
behavior
100
content
10
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

high

phishing

Domain 'portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click' uses a deceptive structure mimicking a legitimate customer protection portal ('protecao-cliente' means 'client protection' in Portuguese). The subdomain 'portal-bia' combined with a .click TLD and a Portuguese-language trust-baiting domain name is a classic phishing pattern designed to impersonate a financial or government institution's client portal. (location: domain: portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click)

high

brand impersonation

The domain 'protecao-cliente.click' translates to 'client-protection.click' in Portuguese and the subdomain 'portal-bia' likely impersonates BIA (Banco Inter or another Brazilian financial/government entity). This pattern is consistent with Brazilian financial brand impersonation campaigns targeting users through fake customer protection portals. (location: domain: portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click)

high

credential harvesting

The combination of a fake customer protection portal domain, .click TLD, and failed TLS connection (connected=false, cert_valid=false) is strongly indicative of a credential harvesting site. Fake 'portal' and 'protecao-cliente' branding is commonly used to trick victims into submitting login credentials or personal data. (location: domain: portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click; TLS: connected=false, cert_valid=false)

medium

malicious redirect

The .click TLD is frequently abused in redirect chains and malvertising campaigns. The site could serve as a redirect node routing victims to downstream credential harvesting or malware delivery pages. The failed TLS connection may indicate the page content was not retrievable, potentially because it fingerprints visitors before serving malicious content. (location: domain: portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click; metadata.json tls.connected=false)

high

social engineering

The domain name pattern 'protecao-cliente' (client protection) is a social engineering construct designed to instill false trust and urgency. Users searching for account protection or fraud resolution services may be deceived into believing this is a legitimate institutional portal, lowering their guard before submitting sensitive information. (location: domain: portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click safe for AI agents to use?

portal-bia.protecao-cliente.click currently scores 41/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 6, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.