Is pornhits.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
40/100

context safety score

A score of 40/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
80
content
0
graph
30

11 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Popunder/tabunder ad system configured to fire on user clicks across the page, redirecting users to third-party ad networks (tubecup.net, ntvpforever.com, boannred.com, online-hd.amazingcontent.site). The system is designed to suppress pops for Google-referred traffic to avoid detection while aggressively firing for other traffic sources. (location: page.html:lines 97-489, window["_rb6w3t7z1l"] config and popOptions config blocks)

medium

malicious redirect

Hard-link navigation items dynamically injected via JavaScript redirect users to obfuscated affiliate tracking URLs: https://s.ku34bh9la09.com/v1/d.php?z=2928 (labeled 'Teamskeet FREE WEEK') and https://rtr2perf1.com/37f77684-ae10-45df-9af0-40b738f664dc (labeled 'AI JERK OFF'). These use tracker-style domains that obscure the final destination. (location: page.html:lines 103-144, hlink_1 variable assignments)

medium

obfuscated code

Obfuscated string constructed by reversing a char-code array: var mk = [101,99,114,117,111,115,95,97,109,103,97,109].map(function(e){ return String.fromCharCode(e) }).reverse().join('') decodes to 'magma_source'. This value is then sent to Yandex Metrika analytics as a user parameter, obscuring what data is being exfiltrated. (location: page.html:line 47, iirEf analytics function)

medium

hidden content

Base64-encoded configuration blob in variable cGAm2MphS contains siteId, ad server references (vstvstsa.com for VAST ads), and hardlink URL. Decoded value reveals ad infrastructure details hidden from casual inspection. A second blob fqp3VeZWI encodes placeholder configuration. (location: page.html:line 94, body-opening script block)

medium

social engineering

Time-gated promotional links use urgency tactics: 'Teamskeet FREE WEEK' (active until 2026/04/01) and 'AI JERK OFF' (active until 2026/03/15) are injected as top navigation items using a blinking green dot animation to draw attention. These are affiliate traffic redirects disguised as site navigation. (location: page.html:lines 103-144, hlink_1 conditional blocks)

low

social engineering

In-player button labeled 'FULL VIDEO HERE' (active until 2026/03/31) redirects to https://fhgte.com/tour with affiliate tracking parameters, implying free full video access while actually routing to an external paid/affiliate content site. The locker_url and _plBtn mechanism gates content behind an external redirect. (location: page.html:lines 962-976, window._plBtn and window._plBtnText assignments)

low

hidden content

Yandex Metrika analytics (ym ID 61864270) tracks user cookie values and campaign parameters and transmits them to mc.yandex.ru. The tracked cookie key is obfuscated via char-code reversal. This sends visitor cookie data to a Russian analytics service without explicit disclosure. (location: page.html:lines 59-65, Yandex Metrika initialization block)

low

malicious redirect

Push notification service worker registered at /ps/vOK8Xj.js and /ps/jenya14.js with auction URL at notification.tubecup.net and subInterstitialSettings directLink pointing to online-hd.amazingcontent.site. This enables persistent background redirects after notification permission is granted. (location: page.html:line 97, window["_rb6w3t7z1l"] push spot config)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/pornhits.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is pornhits.com safe for AI agents to use?

pornhits.com currently scores 40/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.