Is pelotalibrevivo.net safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
46/100

context safety score

A score of 46/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
80
content
20
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

malicious redirect

The canonical URL points to a different domain (pelotalibretv2.pl) than the serving domain (pelotalibrevivo.net), redirecting link equity and users to a third-party site. The footer also credits 'pelotalibretv2.pl' as the designer/owner, indicating the .net domain is a shadow/clone site funneling traffic. (location: page.html:11 - <link rel="canonical" href="https://www.pelotalibretv2.pl/">)

high

malicious redirect

Inline script loads a third-party ad/tracking tag from 'al5sm.com' using an obfuscated self-executing function that dynamically creates and appends a script element. The domain al5sm.com is not a known legitimate CDN and the obfuscated injection pattern is consistent with malvertising or drive-by redirect infrastructure. (location: page.html:24 - s.src='https://al5sm.com/tag.min.js')

medium

obfuscated code

The al5sm.com script is loaded via an obfuscated immediately-invoked expression: (function(s){s.dataset.zone='10554084',s.src='...'})([document.documentElement, document.body].filter(Boolean).pop().appendChild(document.createElement('script'))). This pattern obscures the script injection to evade static analysis. (location: page.html:24)

medium

brand impersonation

The site presents itself as 'PELOTA LIBRE TV' and references legitimate sports brands (NBA, Liga MX, Copa Sudamericana, Premier League, UEFA Champions League, LaLiga, Serie A, Formula 1) to appear as an official or authorized streaming service, while it is an unlicensed piracy aggregator distributing unauthorized streams. (location: page.html:5-6, page-text.txt:5)

medium

malicious redirect

Stream links point to multiple third-party domains (pirlotv3.com, tarjetarojatv.blog, rojadirectatv3.pl, pirlotvonline.blog, pelotalibretv2.pl) known in the piracy ecosystem for hosting aggressive ad redirects, pop-unders, and potentially malicious payloads upon user interaction. (location: page.html:34-62)

medium

social engineering

The site offers free access to premium live sports content (NBA, Liga MX, Copa Sudamericana) to lure users into clicking stream links that lead to third-party domains with potentially malicious ad networks. The promise of free premium content is used as a social engineering lure. (location: page.html:5-6, page-text.txt:5-37)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/pelotalibrevivo.net

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is pelotalibrevivo.net safe for AI agents to use?

pelotalibrevivo.net currently scores 46/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.