Is pdscrb.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
40/100

context safety score

A score of 40/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
5
behavior
100
content
40
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

medium

phishing

Domain pdscrb.com (160 days old) failed TLS connection (connected=false, cert_valid=false), meaning the site cannot be reached over HTTPS. Sites impersonating legitimate services typically use valid TLS; however, an unreachable or misconfigured TLS endpoint combined with a young domain is a common indicator of a phishing infrastructure domain that may be in setup or transitional phase. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false)

medium

brand impersonation

The domain 'pdscrb.com' is a plausible typosquat or abbreviation of 'Poshmark' (poshmark.com), 'Scribd' (scribd.com), or similar consumer brands. The compressed alphanumeric pattern (pd+scrb) is consistent with brand-abbreviation squatting tactics used to deceive users and AI agents resolving brand names. (location: metadata.json: domain=pdscrb.com)

high

phishing

The site returned empty page content (page.html and page-text.txt are both empty) despite the domain being 160 days old and having a hosting presence. Empty or cloaked page delivery is a known evasion technique: content is served only to targeted victims or specific user-agents, while returning blank pages to scanners and crawlers. This is a strong indicator of active phishing or credential harvesting infrastructure operating in a cloaked/targeted mode. (location: page.html (0 bytes), page-text.txt (0 bytes))

high

credential harvesting

Combination of factors — young domain (160 days), failed TLS, unknown hosting reputation, not blocklisted yet, and zero visible content returned to scanner — matches the profile of a credential harvesting site in early deployment that has not yet been reported. The absence of blocklist hits does not indicate safety; it may indicate the domain is newly weaponized. (location: metadata.json: domain_age_days=160, hosting.reputation=Unknown, blocklist.listed=false, tls.connected=false)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/pdscrb.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is pdscrb.com safe for AI agents to use?

pdscrb.com currently scores 40/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.