Is otubex.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
39/100

context safety score

A score of 39/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
80
behavior
100
content
0
graph
30

9 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

high

malicious redirect

Navigation menu contains a tracked affiliate redirect link to Stripchat via go.rmhfrtnd.com with long obfuscated userId and sourceId parameters, routing users through an intermediary tracking/redirect domain before reaching the destination. The URL structure (go.rmhfrtnd.com/smartpop/...) is characteristic of traffic monetization networks that can chain redirects to malicious or deceptive destinations. (location: page.html:118 - <a href="https://go.rmhfrtnd.com/smartpop/213183bbf19adb525b60a6acedc6bc7f4f820d74dcff915eceec809898939c05?userId=...&sourceId=...">Stripchat</a>)

high

malicious redirect

Header banner ad loaded via iframe sourcing from go.mnaspm.com, another opaque redirect/ad-network domain with obfuscated userId and sourceId tracking tokens. The iframe loads external content with no sandbox restrictions, allowing the ad server to execute arbitrary JavaScript within the page context. (location: page.html:125 - <iframe src="https://go.mnaspm.com/smartpop/892ba35e3fed4f61bf21c650534ccc486d3eabe6e8e97a208c8faff41af86c66?userId=...&sourceId=headerbanner">)

medium

malicious redirect

TrafficStar popunder ad network script loaded from cdn.tsyndicate.com with spot ID d4f4dbea65de4879aaf49cfee71ba4f6. PopUnder scripts are used to silently open new browser windows/tabs to arbitrary URLs without user consent, a common vector for delivering phishing pages, tech-support scam pages, and credential harvesting sites. (location: page.html:631 - <script src="//cdn.tsyndicate.com/sdk/v1/p.js" data-ts-spot="d4f4dbea65de4879aaf49cfee71ba4f6" ...>)

medium

malicious redirect

TSVideoInstantMessage widget loaded from cdn.tsyndicate.com with spot ID d98765aa50374ad2b282f48ed70dcced. This TrafficStar product injects floating video ad units that can trigger popunder redirects on click, routing users to third-party destinations not controlled by the site operator. (location: page.html:634-646 - TSVideoInstantMessage({spot: "d98765aa50374ad2b282f48ed70dcced", ...}))

medium

malicious redirect

JuicyAds popunder script loaded from js.juicyads.com with redirect target encoded as URL parameter pointing to juicyads.rocks. JuicyAds is an adult ad network known to serve popunder advertisements that redirect to potentially harmful pages including fake prize pages, tech-support scams, and subscription traps. (location: page.html:653 - <script src="https://js.juicyads.com/jp.php?c=34e4v233t254u4q2x26433d474&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.juicyads.rocks">)

low

social engineering

Site presents itself as hosting amateur/homemade content with real named individuals (e.g., Andrea Ceballos, Sondra Blust, Vanessa Bohorquez) in video titles, implying non-consensual or leaked intimate content. This pattern is used to attract users searching for specific individuals and can facilitate sextortion or credential harvesting via fake login walls. (location: page.html:349-458 - video title listings including named individuals)

low

hidden content

The age_check JavaScript variable is explicitly set to 0 (age_check=0), indicating the site has disabled its age verification gate. While not a direct threat, disabling age checks is a regulatory compliance violation and signals that the operator may be evading safeguards, consistent with low-quality or rogue adult site behavior. (location: page.html:605 - var age_check=0;)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/otubex.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is otubex.com safe for AI agents to use?

otubex.com currently scores 39/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.