Is otrqdrscbe.xyz safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
39/100

context safety score

A score of 39/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
30
behavior
100
content
27
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

high

phishing

Domain 'otrqdrscbe.xyz' uses a randomly-generated, nonsensical string as a name — a strong indicator of a throwaway phishing or malware-distribution domain. The .xyz TLD is frequently abused for low-cost disposable phishing infrastructure. (location: metadata.json: domain)

critical

phishing

TLS connection failed entirely (connected=false, cert_valid=false). The site cannot establish a valid HTTPS session, which means either the server is intentionally down between campaigns, the infrastructure is being cycled, or the domain is parked awaiting payload deployment. Legitimate sites do not present with completely broken TLS. (location: metadata.json: tls)

medium

hidden content

Page HTML, visible text, and hidden text are all empty despite the domain resolving through hosting infrastructure. This blank-page pattern is consistent with a cloaked or gated phishing page that only serves content to targeted victims (e.g., via referrer check, geofencing, or user-agent filtering), hiding malicious content from scanners. (location: page.html, page-text.txt, page-hidden.txt)

medium

malicious redirect

A live domain with hosting ('MajorCloud') that returns no content is a common staging pattern for redirect chains: the domain acts as a hop point that serves a redirect only to qualifying traffic, evading static analysis while routing victims to a downstream payload or credential-harvesting page. (location: metadata.json: hosting, page.html (empty))

low

social engineering

WHOIS domain age is null/unknown and privacy status is unresolved, indicating either very recent registration or deliberate opacity. Newly registered domains with opaque ownership are a primary vector for social-engineering campaigns where trust has not yet been established and blocklists have not yet flagged the domain. (location: metadata.json: whois)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/otrqdrscbe.xyz

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is otrqdrscbe.xyz safe for AI agents to use?

otrqdrscbe.xyz currently scores 39/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.