Is onlineksrtcswift.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
33/100

context safety score

A score of 33/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
50
content
0
graph
30

11 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page loads content in transparent or zero-size iframe overlay

medium

js obfuscation

Obfuscated document.write with encoded content

high

brand impersonation

The domain onlineksrtcswift.com impersonates the official Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The real KSRTC online booking portal is ksrtcswift.com (a government domain), while this site uses a lookalike domain with 'online' prepended. The site extensively uses KSRTC branding, logos, official contact numbers, and government imagery to appear legitimate. (location: page.html:43, metadata.json:domain, page.html:7-11)

high

credential harvesting

The site presents a login/signup form that collects Indian mobile phone numbers and validates OTP via /api/resource/APIValidateAgentOTPLogin. Upon successful OTP validation, the site harvests full PII including customer name, age, email, gender, date of birth, date of anniversary, GST company name, and GST number — all sent in plaintext via GET request parameters to /my_profile/saveProfile. (location: page.html:96-279, page.html:619-697, page.html:832-840)

medium

credential harvesting

Sensitive profile data (name, age, email, gender, GST number, mobile, DOB, DOA) is transmitted via HTTP GET request with all PII as URL query parameters, making them visible in server logs, browser history, and any intermediary proxies. The endpoint is /my_profile/saveProfile. (location: page.html:834)

high

phishing

The site is a convincing phishing replica of KSRTC SWIFT's official bus ticketing platform. It includes real KSRTC contact numbers (0471-2463799, 9447071021, 18005994011), official social media links, realistic route and destination content, and app store links — all designed to deceive users into believing they are on the legitimate government booking portal. (location: page.html:913-914, page.html:963-983, page.html:2019-2023)

medium

hidden content

The login/signup modal (div.signup-wrap) is rendered with display:none and is hidden from users on page load, but contains fully functional credential collection forms including OTP generation, OTP validation, and profile data collection. The complete profile form is also hidden (style='display:none') and revealed only after OTP validation. (location: page.html:93-287, page.html:317-330, page.html:103-109)

low

hidden content

Commented-out HTML includes a footer discount banner referencing Paytm cashback promotions with terms dated October 2018, suggesting this template was originally built for a different operator or was copied/repurposed. The commented code references /img/paytm-new.jpg and Paytm-specific cashback T&Cs. (location: page.html:3767-3790, page-hidden.txt:161-234)

medium

social engineering

The site uses social proof tactics including fabricated or unverifiable customer testimonials (Shaji Thekkekara, Mukesh Kumar, Krishna Kumar) with generic 'Traveller' designations, loyalty benefit messaging ('earn loyalty benefits'), and urgency messaging ('Book round trip tickets - Get 10% Discount') to manipulate users into submitting personal data and completing transactions. (location: page.html:1899-1950, page.html:97-98, page.html:1357-1358)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/onlineksrtcswift.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is onlineksrtcswift.com safe for AI agents to use?

onlineksrtcswift.com currently scores 33/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.