Is nm.ru safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
43/100

context safety score

A score of 43/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
80
content
14
graph
30

8 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

phishing

1 deceptive links where visible host does not match destination host

medium

malicious redirect

Main content links to http://pochtamt.ru (plain HTTP, external domain) for obtaining an @nm.ru email address. This redirects users away from nm.ru to an unverified third-party site over an unencrypted connection, posing a credential harvesting or phishing risk. (location: page.html:253 — <a href="http://pochtamt.ru">ссылке</a>)

low

malicious redirect

Content links to http://pager.run/ (plain HTTP) promoting a 'secure encrypted messenger'. Directing users to an unencrypted third-party messenger service is contradictory and potentially deceptive. (location: page.html:260 — <a href="http://pager.run/">PAGER.RUN</a>)

medium

social engineering

The page uses urgency language ('срочно расскажите' — 'urgently tell') to pressure users into spreading the site to others, a classic viral social engineering tactic to expand reach for credential harvesting or phishing campaigns. (location: page.html:256 — 'срочно расскажите ему о нашем сайте')

low

hidden content

Yandex Metrica noscript tracking pixel is positioned off-screen (left:-9999px) to invisibly track all visitors including those with JavaScript disabled. This is covert user surveillance. (location: page.html:283 — <img src="https://mc.yandex.ru/watch/101136071" style="position:absolute; left:-9999px;" alt=""/>)

medium

social engineering

Page title and main heading ('Премиальная почта, о которой я всегда мечтал' — 'The premium email I always dreamed of') combined with 'Пусть это имя будет с вами всегда!' ('Let this name be with you always!') use aspirational/emotional language to entice users into signing up for an email service on an external domain (pochtamt.ru), a social engineering lure. (location: page.html:238,251 — post title and opening paragraph)

medium

credential harvesting

The site solicits users to register for an @nm.ru email address but redirects them to an external HTTP site (pochtamt.ru) for signup. Credentials entered at that third-party site cannot be verified as safe, and the use of HTTP means credentials would be transmitted in plaintext. (location: page.html:252-253 — email signup redirect to http://pochtamt.ru)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/nm.ru

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is nm.ru safe for AI agents to use?

nm.ru currently scores 43/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.