Is mr-jatt.im safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
49/100

context safety score

A score of 49/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
80
content
44
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

brand impersonation

The site mr-jatt.im impersonates the well-known mr-jatt.com music platform, using nearly identical branding, title ('Mr-Jatt.Com Latest Punjabi Songs'), and keywords. The .im domain is used to clone the identity of the legitimate .com site, misleading users into believing they are on the original platform. (location: page.html:9-11, metadata.json:domain)

medium

hidden content

A block of keyword-stuffed text is hidden from users via the HTML 'hidden' attribute. It contains dozens of competitor domain names and SEO spam terms (mr-jatt.com, mr-jatt.in, pagalworld, djjohal.com, etc.) invisible to visitors but readable by crawlers and AI agents, designed to manipulate search rankings and agent context. (location: page.html:165-181)

medium

obfuscated code

Multiple script tags use a non-standard, obfuscated MIME type '337ded52825f17516c5a28a5-text/javascript' instead of 'text/javascript'. This is a Cloudflare Rocket Loader technique but is also used to delay or obscure script execution from security scanners. Scripts affected include the date display script, Google CSE loader, and Statcounter tracker. (location: page.html:121, page.html:140, page.html:190, page.html:195, page.html:203)

low

malicious redirect

A hyperlink on line 158 contains a malformed/unclosed href attribute: href="https://djpunjab.im> — the closing quote is missing, causing the attribute to bleed into adjacent HTML. This can result in unintended link behavior or redirect manipulation depending on browser parsing, and may be an intentional obfuscation technique. (location: page.html:158)

low

social engineering

The site falsely claims all content is provided under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA licenses, implying legitimacy for music downloads that are likely copyrighted. This misrepresentation encourages users to download potentially infringing content under a false sense of legal safety. (location: page.html:161)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/mr-jatt.im

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is mr-jatt.im safe for AI agents to use?

mr-jatt.im currently scores 49/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.