Is mp4moviez.talk safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
27/100

context safety score

A score of 27/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
0
content
0
graph
30

9 threat patterns detected

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

social engineering

Site presents itself as a legitimate free movie download platform ('Mp4moviez Official Website for Movies'), using urgency badges like 'Hot' and 'First On NET' to lure users into clicking links that likely lead to ad-heavy or malware-distributing pages. The platform offers copyrighted content for free to attract and manipulate users. (location: page.html:149, page.html:382-413)

high

malicious redirect

External link to 'https://www.hdmaal.cat/' is embedded inline with legitimate internal navigation links, disguised as a content category ('Watch Online Hot Web Series & Short Films'). This cross-site redirect to an unrelated adult content domain is deceptive and typical of traffic monetization schemes that can expose users to malware or phishing. (location: page.html:163)

medium

malicious redirect

External link to 'https://www.maza18.net/' (adult content site) embedded within the site's navigation without clear disclosure that it is an external site, presented alongside internal folder navigation links. (location: page.html:418)

medium

malicious redirect

External link to 'https://moviezmad.com/' embedded within the site's navigation without clear disclosure that it is an external site, presented alongside internal folder navigation links in a way that blurs the distinction between internal and external destinations. (location: page.html:423)

high

brand impersonation

The site impersonates or trades on the well-known 'Mp4Moviez' brand name across multiple domains (references to mp4moviez.com, mp4moviez.in, mp4moviez.xyz, mp4moviez.kiwi, mp4moviez.ch, mp4moviez.company in meta keywords), operating from mp4moviez.talk. This multi-domain brand squatting pattern is used to capture users searching for the original site and funnel them through this potentially malicious mirror. (location: page.html:19, page.html:434)

medium

social engineering

Telegram channel link (https://t.me/newupdts) is prominently placed in the header as an image button to drive users to an external messaging channel, a common technique used to build a captive audience for further social engineering, scam promotions, or malware distribution. (location: page.html:155-158)

low

hidden content

A commented-out search form pointing to 'https://google.com/m/search' with a hidden field 'as_sitesearch' set to 'mp4moviez.company' (a different domain) is present in the HTML source. This reveals a prior or alternate domain affiliation and SEO manipulation tactic that is hidden from visible page rendering. (location: page.html:164-167)

medium

social engineering

The site prominently lists adult/18+ rated content (multiple UNRATED and UNCUT films) intermingled with general audience content without adequate age verification, using titillating titles to attract clicks. This is a common lure technique used on piracy sites to maximize engagement and ad revenue exposure. (location: page.html:190, 208-268)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/mp4moviez.talk

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is mp4moviez.talk safe for AI agents to use?

mp4moviez.talk currently scores 27/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.