Is moviesda16.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
32/100

context safety score

A score of 32/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
55
content
10
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

malicious redirect

The site is hosted at moviesda16.com but the og:url meta tag and the search form's hidden 'as_sitesearch' field both point to moviesda17.com, redirecting users and search context to a different domain. This cross-domain misdirection is a common tactic used by piracy/scam networks to funnel traffic across mirror domains. (location: page.html:18 (og:url), page.html:42 (as_sitesearch input))

high

brand impersonation

The site impersonates the well-known piracy brand 'Moviesda' (Moviesda.Mobi, Moviesda.io) while claiming moviesda17.com is the 'only official' site. The current domain moviesda16.com is itself an impersonation clone in a numbered domain chain, using brand cloning to attract users with fake legitimacy. The footer copyright claims 'Moviesda.io' while the header branding says 'Moviesda.Mobi', mixing multiple brand identities. (location: page.html:25, page.html:134-149, page.html:158)

high

social engineering

The 'Official Moviesda Website Notice' section actively manipulates users by claiming moviesda17.com is the sole legitimate site and warning users to avoid 'fake' sites — while this notice itself is served from moviesda16.com, a clone. This reverse-psychology tactic is used to build false trust and drive users to another controlled domain (moviesda17.com), a social engineering pattern common in piracy/scam site networks. (location: page.html:134-149)

medium

malicious redirect

A third-party script is loaded from //jd.nimbusbizarre.com/rQ2OSv3NBElX3Jl/70386 with data-cfasync=false and async attributes. The domain 'nimbusbizarre.com' is an ad/redirect network associated with aggressive ad injection and malicious redirect chains commonly found on piracy sites. This script can silently redirect users or inject malicious ads. (location: page.html:167)

medium

hidden content

A zero-width non-joiner character (​) is embedded mid-text in a movie listing title ('Azhagai Irukkirai Bayamai Irukkirathu (2006), Punnagai Poove (2003) ​HD DVDRip'), invisible to users but present in the DOM. While potentially benign, zero-width characters are a known technique to evade text-based content filters and search detection. (location: page.html:96)

medium

social engineering

The Telegram Channel link uses href='#' (no actual destination), a deceptive pattern that lures users into clicking a social media follow link that goes nowhere, or is populated dynamically by injected scripts. Combined with the third-party ad script, this may be used to track clicks or redirect to a Telegram channel used for malware distribution. (location: page.html:30)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/moviesda16.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is moviesda16.com safe for AI agents to use?

moviesda16.com currently scores 32/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.