Is moviesda15.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
35/100

context safety score

A score of 35/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
55
content
17
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

high

malicious redirect

The site is hosted at moviesda15.com but the og:url meta tag and the search form's hidden 'as_sitesearch' field both point to moviesda17.com, silently redirecting Google search queries to a different domain. This cross-domain mismatch is used to funnel user traffic to a separate site. (location: page.html:18 (og:url), page.html:42 (as_sitesearch hidden input))

high

social engineering

The page impersonates an 'official' Moviesda notice claiming moviesda17.com is the 'only official and current website' and warns users that 'any other website claiming to be Moviesda is fake'. This tactic manipulates users on moviesda15.com into trusting and navigating to moviesda17.com, a classic trust-hijacking technique used by piracy network operators to consolidate traffic. (location: page.html:134-149)

high

malicious redirect

Third-party script loaded from //jd.nimbusbizarre.com — an unrecognized ad/redirect network domain — with data-cfasync=false to bypass Cloudflare's script filtering. This pattern is commonly used by malvertising networks to serve aggressive redirects, pop-unders, or drive-by download payloads. (location: page.html:167)

medium

brand impersonation

The domain moviesda15.com impersonates the well-known piracy brand 'Moviesda' (moviesda.mobi / moviesda.io) using a numbered variant domain. The page branding, title, and content all present as the authentic Moviesda service to deceive users into treating it as legitimate. (location: page.html:7,25,34 (title, site-title span, h1))

medium

brand impersonation

The footer copyright claims '© Moviesda.io' while the site is actually moviesda15.com, and the header presents as 'Moviesda.Mobi'. Multiple brand identities are co-opted simultaneously to appear legitimate regardless of which variant the user searches for. (location: page.html:158)

low

hidden content

A zero-width non-joiner character (​) is embedded inline within a movie title text node ('Punnagai Poove (2003) ​HD DVDRip'). While potentially benign, invisible Unicode characters in content are a known technique for evading keyword filters and search engine duplicate-content detection. (location: page.html:96)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/moviesda15.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is moviesda15.com safe for AI agents to use?

moviesda15.com currently scores 35/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.