Is monetate-prod.zone safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
48/100

context safety score

A score of 48/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
45
behavior
100
content
40
graph
30

5 threat patterns detected

high

tls connection failed

Could not establish TLS connection

high

brand impersonation

The domain 'monetate-prod.zone' impersonates Monetate, a legitimate e-commerce personalization platform (monetate.com). The use of a non-standard TLD '.zone' combined with a production-sounding subdomain pattern ('monetate-prod') is a classic brand impersonation technique designed to deceive users and automated systems into trusting the domain as an official Monetate infrastructure endpoint. (location: domain: monetate-prod.zone)

high

malicious redirect

TLS connection failed (connected=false, cert_valid=false) for a domain impersonating a legitimate SaaS brand. The site cannot be reached over HTTPS despite using an HTTPS URL, which may indicate the domain is parked, used for DNS-based redirection, or configured to intercept traffic at a lower layer. This pattern is consistent with a domain used as a redirect or traffic interception node. (location: metadata.json: tls.connected=false, tls.cert_valid=false)

medium

phishing

The domain 'monetate-prod.zone' combines a well-known SaaS brand name with a production-environment label under a low-credibility TLD ('.zone'). This combination is characteristic of phishing infrastructure targeting developers, DevOps engineers, or automated agents that interact with Monetate APIs, potentially to harvest API keys, OAuth tokens, or session credentials by posing as a legitimate Monetate production endpoint. (location: domain: monetate-prod.zone)

medium

credential harvesting

A domain impersonating a SaaS production environment (Monetate) with no valid TLS certificate is a strong indicator of a credential harvesting setup. Automated agents or CI/CD pipelines configured to communicate with 'monetate-prod.zone' endpoints could be tricked into submitting API credentials or authentication tokens to an attacker-controlled server. (location: metadata.json: domain=monetate-prod.zone, tls.cert_valid=false)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/monetate-prod.zone

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is monetate-prod.zone safe for AI agents to use?

monetate-prod.zone currently scores 48/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.