Is mlookalporno.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
39/100

context safety score

A score of 39/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
90
behavior
80
content
4
graph
30

9 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

high

cloaking

Page conditionally redirects based on referrer or user-agent

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

malicious redirect

Popup/popunder ad script from a.pemsrv.com (ExoClick ad network) is configured with new_tab:true, popup_fallback:true, and trigger_method:2, meaning clicks on images or titles trigger redirects to third-party ad destinations. This is a known aggressive ad network used on adult sites to redirect users to potentially malicious or deceptive pages. (location: page.html:1467-1493 (inline script, adConfig with ads_host: a.pemsrv.com, idzone: 4644858))

medium

malicious redirect

Frame-busting script forces top-level navigation when page is loaded inside an iframe: top.location.href = document.location.href. While sometimes legitimate, this can be abused to hijack navigation context or break security sandboxing in agent/browser automation environments. (location: page.html:36-39)

medium

obfuscated code

All script tags use a non-standard type attribute value '50ad13a56c9602bb991c710a-text/javascript' instead of 'text/javascript'. This is a Cloudflare Rocket Loader obfuscation technique that defers script execution. Scripts are loaded via /cdn-cgi/scripts/7d0fa10a/cloudflare-static/rocket-loader.min.js which rewrites the type attribute — however this pattern can also be used to hide script execution from naive scanners. (location: page.html:14,19,23,35,1457-1462,1467)

low

hidden content

Two tag URLs use MD5-style hash slugs instead of human-readable Arabic text, while displaying normal Arabic labels. The URLs /tag/0d501a71c88574eee616222fc994250f/ and /tag/66bd9de2affb3ce38ac864a307ef0a9f/ are obfuscated paths that do not match the visible tag names 'السكس' and 'سكس', which may indicate tracking tokens or cloaked redirect paths. (location: page.html:1382-1386)

low

social engineering

Site includes a navigation link to an external domain sexumahat.com opened in a new tab (target=_blank), directing users off-site to another adult property without warning. Combined with the popup ad network, this creates a multi-vector user redirection pattern typical of traffic monetization schemes that may expose users to malicious third-party content. (location: page.html:188)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/mlookalporno.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is mlookalporno.com safe for AI agents to use?

mlookalporno.com currently scores 39/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.