Is lotus365exch.win safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
39/100

context safety score

A score of 39/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
75
content
0
graph
30

8 threat patterns detected

high

hidden instruction

high hidden content ratio detected in DOM

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

high

brand impersonation

Domain 'lotus365exch.win' uses a .win TLD combined with the 'lotus365' brand name, impersonating Lotus365, a known online gambling/exchange betting platform. The use of a non-standard TLD (.win) with a recognizable brand name is a classic brand impersonation pattern used to deceive users into believing they are on the legitimate site. (location: metadata.json: domain field / URL https://lotus365exch.win)

medium

hidden content

Commented-out IP harvesting script found in HTML source: a JSONP call to https://api.ipify.org with a callback that writes the visitor's public IP to the document. Though currently commented out, its presence indicates prior or potential future use for covert IP address collection and user tracking/profiling. (location: page-hidden.txt lines 7-13 / page.html lines 22-28)

medium

hidden content

Commented-out Facebook Meta Pixel tracking code (Pixel ID: 1949390595505532) found in HTML source. Though disabled, it was previously used for covert user behavior tracking and audience profiling via Facebook's ad network, without visible disclosure to users. (location: page-hidden.txt lines 14-30 / page.html lines 30-44)

low

hidden content

Page visible text is entirely empty (whitespace only), while the page loads multiple JavaScript bundles (main.fdf52088928184f5a48c.js, vendor.js, custom.js, messages.js, socket.io.js). All content is rendered dynamically via an Angular app-root component, making static analysis of the actual site content and any embedded threats impossible without JavaScript execution. (location: page-text.txt (all lines blank) / page.html line 49: <app-root></app-root>)

medium

social engineering

The site operates as an online gambling/betting exchange ('exch' in domain) under the Lotus365 brand. Online betting platforms operating on non-standard TLDs (.win) are frequently used to lure users with promises of gambling winnings, operating outside regulated jurisdictions, targeting users in regions where such platforms are restricted or illegal (e.g., India). (location: metadata.json: domain 'lotus365exch.win')

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/lotus365exch.win

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is lotus365exch.win safe for AI agents to use?

lotus365exch.win currently scores 39/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.