Is lenzmx.com safe?

suspiciousmedium confidence
48/100

context safety score

A score of 48/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
100
behavior
80
content
20
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

malicious redirect

script/meta redirect patterns detected in page source

medium

cloaking

Page uses meta refresh redirect

high

malicious redirect

The page hosted on lenzmx.com contains a meta refresh tag that immediately redirects visitors (content='0; URL=https://www.mobvista.com/cn') to a completely different domain (mobvista.com). The scanned URL is lenzmx.com but the page impersonates and redirects to mobvista.com, suggesting lenzmx.com is acting as a redirect intermediary or parked/hijacked domain funneling traffic to another site. (location: page.html:9 - <meta http-equiv='refresh' content='0; URL=https://www.mobvista.com/cn'>)

high

brand impersonation

The page hosted on lenzmx.com fully reproduces the branding, content, logo, and identity of Mobvista (广州汇量信息科技有限公司), a legitimate Chinese ad-tech company (HK:01860), including their logo, taglines, statistics, copyright notice, and Chinese ICP filing number. The domain lenzmx.com has no apparent affiliation with Mobvista, indicating the site is impersonating the Mobvista brand. (location: page.html:2,29-31,85 - saved from mobvista.com comment, Mobvista logo, Copyright 2023 Mobvista)

medium

hidden content

The HTML comment at the top of the page explicitly states 'saved from url=(0028)https://www.mobvista.com/cn/' — a hallmark of locally-saved or cloned pages being re-served from a different domain. The page also contains a hidden div element (position: absolute; top: -10000px; width: 0px; height: 0px) used to hide content from view, and a robots meta tag set to 'noindex, nofollow' to prevent search engine indexing and crawling, which is a common tactic to avoid detection while still serving the page to users or bots. (location: page.html:2,8,69-71 - saved-from comment, noindex/nofollow meta, off-screen hidden div)

medium

social engineering

The page presents itself as a legitimate, established Chinese technology company (Mobvista/汇量科技) complete with corporate statistics (10,000+ active developers, 200B+ daily ad requests, 17 global offices), corporate branding, and regulatory filings (ICP license, public security registration). This creates a false sense of legitimacy and trustworthiness for a page being served from an unrelated domain (lenzmx.com), which could be used to deceive users or automated agents into trusting the site. (location: page.html:43-65, page-text.txt:20-41 - corporate statistics and legitimacy signals)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/lenzmx.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is lenzmx.com safe for AI agents to use?

lenzmx.com currently scores 48/100 with a suspicious verdict and medium confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.