Is leercapitulo.co safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
42/100

context safety score

A score of 42/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
80
content
27
graph
30

6 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

malicious redirect

Third-party ad script loaded from 'll.cheefulfrary.com' via a non-standard subdomain pattern with obfuscated path '/sFXwpxgiJYBD4E/116857'. This domain does not correspond to any known legitimate ad network and is a common vector for malvertising and drive-by redirects. (location: page.html:50)

high

malicious redirect

Dynamically injected script from 'bvtpk.com' using an inline IIFE pattern that appends a script tag for 'tag.min.js' with zone ID 9335803. The domain 'bvtpk.com' is an unrecognized ad/tracker network frequently associated with aggressive redirect chains and potentially unwanted ad injections. (location: page.html:51)

medium

brand impersonation

The site distributes copyrighted manga content (One Piece, One Punch-Man, Hajime no Ippo, Blue Lock, etc.) without authorization, impersonating legitimate manga publishers and platforms (e.g., Shonen Jump, VIZ Media). This constitutes brand/IP impersonation and may be used to funnel users toward ad-monetized or malicious third-party scripts. (location: page.html:158-474)

low

hidden content

The H1 tag on the page is explicitly hidden via inline style 'display: none' and contains no text. While this alone is not conclusive, combined with a piracy site context and third-party ad scripts, it may be used to suppress content from user view while serving it to crawlers or bots. (location: page.html:102)

medium

social engineering

The site presents itself as a free, legitimate manga reading service ('El mejor lugar para leer el último y mejor Manga para GRATIS!'), exploiting user desire for free copyrighted content to drive high-volume traffic through multiple unvetted third-party ad networks, increasing exposure to malvertising and drive-by threats. (location: page.html:8-9, metadata.json)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/leercapitulo.co

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is leercapitulo.co safe for AI agents to use?

leercapitulo.co currently scores 42/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.