Is kaskusacc.com safe?

suspiciouslow confidence
26/100

context safety score

A score of 26/100 indicates multiple risk signals were detected. This entity shows patterns commonly associated with malicious intent.

identity
60
behavior
50
content
0
graph
30

11 threat patterns detected

medium

encoded payload

suspicious base64-like blobs detected in page content

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript contains heavy hex-escape encoding typical of obfuscation

high

js obfuscation

JavaScript uses Function constructor for runtime code generation

critical

brand impersonation

The site operates as kaskusacc.com (80 days old) but presents itself as 'KASKUSTOTO' and 'KASKUSCAIR', impersonating Kaskus, a well-known Indonesian internet forum/brand. The domain name embeds 'kaskus' to deceive users into believing this is an official or affiliated Kaskus property, while it is actually an unlicensed online gambling operation. (location: page.html:<title>, metadata.json:domain, page.html:line 374, footer text)

critical

phishing

The site presents a login form with username and password fields directly in the navbar. The canonical URL redirects to kaskuscair.com, but the site domain is kaskusacc.com — a pattern where users believe they are logging into a familiar branded platform but are submitting credentials to an impostor domain. The 'Lupa Password' (Forgot Password) link is dynamically hijacked via JavaScript to redirect to a Telegram channel (https://t.me/CSKASKUS1) instead of a legitimate password recovery flow. (location: page.html:lines 25-33, 335-349)

critical

credential harvesting

Login form collects username and password. Password is processed through a custom MD5 hashing script (/js/vbulletin_md5.js) before submission. The 'forgot password' link is overridden by JavaScript to route users to a Telegram channel (https://t.me/CSKASKUS1), bypassing any account recovery mechanism and directing victims to an attacker-controlled channel where credentials or personal data can be collected socially. (location: page.html:lines 25-33, 335-349, 3349)

high

malicious redirect

The page sets two canonical URLs pointing to kaskuscair.com (lines 4 and 21), while the actual serving domain is kaskusacc.com. Navigation links in the footer also direct users to kaskuscair.com and kaskusapp.com. The amphtml link points to kaskusapp.pages.dev. These cross-domain redirects funnel users between multiple attacker-controlled domains, obscuring the true origin and fragmenting user tracking/attribution. (location: page.html:lines 4, 21, 208, 2099-2107, 3337)

high

obfuscated code

Multiple large blocks of heavily obfuscated JavaScript are present, using hex-encoded variable names (_0x13f34d, _0x48ca53, etc.), string-shuffling self-executing arrays, and encoded string literals. These blocks are attributed to 'TIGER_DEVS' via ASCII-art comments. The obfuscation hides the true behavior of the scripts, which manipulate the DOM, inject banners, display fake withdrawal/deposit notifications, and potentially perform actions not visible in source review. (location: page.html:lines 523-536, 534-535, 1330, 2296)

high

social engineering

The site displays fake real-time transaction notifications (snackbar-mobile) with randomly generated usernames and randomized withdrawal amounts (generated client-side in obfuscated JS), creating a false impression of high activity and large payouts to pressure visitors into registering and depositing. Fake online user counts (minuseronline: 50000, maxuseronline: 100000) and a fabricated jackpot amount ('4,131,665,972 IDR') are injected dynamically via the desktopIdn configuration object. (location: page.html:lines 1335-1338, 2119-2283)

medium

hidden content

A 1x1 pixel invisible iframe is injected at the bottom of the page via inline script to load Cloudflare challenge scripts. While Cloudflare itself is legitimate, the pattern of injecting hidden iframes is also used for covert tracking or fingerprinting. Additionally, seven separate Facebook Meta Pixel IDs and three TikTok Pixel IDs are loaded, enabling cross-site behavioral tracking of visitors across unrelated platforms without visible disclosure. (location: page.html:lines 44-168, 1349-1407, 3362)

medium

social engineering

The site loads a third-party CSS/JS resource from a GitHub repository belonging to user 'zombief1206' (https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/zombief1206/file-css@main/splide.css and splide.js). Using a personal GitHub CDN for production assets is a supply-chain risk: the repository owner can push malicious code that would be served to all site visitors without any code review or integrity check (no SRI hashes present). (location: page.html:lines 512, 518)

API

curl https://api.brin.sh/domain/kaskusacc.com

FAQ: how to interpret this assessment

Common questions teams ask before deciding whether to use this domain in agent workflows.

Is kaskusacc.com safe for AI agents to use?

kaskusacc.com currently scores 26/100 with a suspicious verdict and low confidence. The goal is to protect agents from high-risk context before they act on it. Treat this as a decision signal: higher scores suggest lower observed risk, while lower scores mean you should add review or block this domain.

How should I interpret the score and verdict?

Use the score as a policy threshold: 80–100 is safe, 50–79 is caution, 20–49 is suspicious, and 0–19 is dangerous. Teams often auto-allow safe, require human review for caution/suspicious, and block dangerous.

How does brin compute this domain score?

brin evaluates four dimensions: identity (source trust), behavior (runtime patterns), content (malicious instructions), and graph (relationship risk). Analysis runs in tiers: static signals, deterministic pattern checks, then AI semantic analysis when needed.

What do identity, behavior, content, and graph mean for this domain?

Identity checks source trust, behavior checks unusual runtime patterns, content checks for malicious instructions, and graph checks risky relationships to other entities. Looking at sub-scores helps you understand why an entity passed or failed.

Why does brin scan packages, repos, skills, MCP servers, pages, and commits?

brin performs risk assessments on external context before it reaches an AI agent. It scores that context for threats like prompt injection, hijacking, credential harvesting, and supply chain attacks, so teams can decide whether to block, review, or proceed safely.

Can I rely on a safe verdict as a full security guarantee?

No. A safe verdict means no significant risk signals were detected in this scan. It is not a formal guarantee; assessments are automated and point-in-time, so combine scores with your own controls and periodic re-checks.

When should I re-check before using an entity?

Re-check before high-impact actions such as installs, upgrades, connecting MCP servers, executing remote code, or granting secrets. Use the API in CI or runtime gates so decisions are based on the latest scan.

Learn more in threat detection docs, how scoring works, and the API overview.

Last Scanned

March 4, 2026

Verdict Scale

safe80–100
caution50–79
suspicious20–49
dangerous0–19

Disclaimer

Assessments are automated and may contain errors. Findings are risk indicators, not confirmed threats. This is a point-in-time assessment; security posture can change.

start scoring agent dependencies.

integrate brin in minutes — one GET request is all it takes. query the api, browse the registry, or download the full dataset.